Your contrastive learning problem is secretly a distribution alignment problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the success of contrastive learning (CL) in vision and language, its theoretical foundations and mechanisms for building representations remain poorly understood. In this work, we build connections between noise contrastive estimation losses widely used in CL and distribution alignment with entropic optimal transport (OT). This connection allows us to develop a family of different losses and multistep iterative variants for existing CL methods. Intuitively, by using more information from the distribution of latents, our approach allows a more distribution-aware manipulation of the relationships within augmented sample sets. We provide theoretical insights and experimental evidence demonstrating the benefits of our approach for em generalized contrastive alignment. Through this framework, it is possible to leverage tools in OT to build unbalanced losses to handle noisy views and customize the representation space by changing the constraints on alignment. By reframing contrastive learning as an alignment problem and leveraging existing optimization tools for OT, our work provides new insights and connections between different self-supervised learning models in addition to new tools that can be more easily adapted to incorporate domain knowledge into learning.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2025.
Builds on
40 of 61 references.
References · 40
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
- 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
- 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
28 more
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
- 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 402
- 2017Wasserstein Auto-Encoderscited by 371
- 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 354
- 2021SelfReg: Self-supervised Contrastive Regularization for Domain Generalizationcited by 189
- 2021Can contrastive learning avoid shortcut solutions?cited by 114
- 2022Understanding Contrastive Learning Requires Incorporating Inductive Biasescited by 96
- 2021Generative Modeling with Optimal Transport Mapscited by 80
- 2021Self-supervised learning methods and applications in medical imaging analysis: A surveycited by 76
- 2019Wasserstein Dependency Measure for Representation Learningcited by 69
- 2023Recent Advances in Optimal Transport for Machine Learningcited by 66
- 2020Wasserstein Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 63
- 2020On Unbalanced Optimal Transport: An Analysis of Sinkhorn Algorithmcited by 61
- 2014Making Risk Minimization Tolerant to Label Noisecited by 54
- 2022Robust Contrastive Learning against Noisy Viewscited by 45
- 2014Multi-marginal optimal transport: theory and applicationscited by 41
- 2019Hierarchical Optimal Transport for Multimodal Distribution Alignmentcited by 38
- 2022A Unified Framework for Implicit Sinkhorn Differentiationcited by 28
- 2019Inverse optimal transportcited by 25
- 2023What's in a Prior? Learned Proximal Networks for Inverse Problemscited by 24
- 2018Learning to Match via Inverse Optimal Transportcited by 22
- 2020Making transport more robust and interpretable by moving data through a small number of anchor pointscited by 18
- 2021Drop, Swap, and Generate: A Self-Supervised Approach for Generating Neural Activitycited by 18
- 2022On the Convergence Rate of Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 16
- 2022Alignment-Uniformity aware Representation Learning for Zero-shot Video Classificationcited by 11
- 2022Integrating Prior Knowledge in Contrastive Learning with Kernelcited by 11
- 2024Exploring Behavior-Relevant and Disentangled Neural Dynamics with Generative Diffusion Modelscited by 9
- 2023Extraction and Recovery of Spatio-Temporal Structure in Latent Dynamics Alignment with Diffusion Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2026Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Latent Distribution Matchingcited by 4
- 2026SOTAlign: Semi-Supervised Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models via Optimal Transportcited by 2
- 2025Towards Achieving Perfect Multimodal Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Align and Adapt: Multimodal Multiview Human Activity Recognition under Arbitrary View Combinationscited by 0
- 2026Local Multimodal Music Alignment from Global Supervisioncited by 0
- 2026Multi-Marginal Inverse Optimal Transport for Contrastive Learning Via Explicit Anchor-Positive-Negative Couplingcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Marginal Inverse Optimal Transport for Contrastive Learning Via Explicit Anchor-Positive-Negative Coupling27 Sep 2026
- 2026Local Multimodal Music Alignment from Global Supervision10 Jul 2026
- 2026Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Latent Distribution Matching5 May 2026
- 2026SOTAlign: Semi-Supervised Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models via Optimal Transport26 Feb 2026
- 2026Align and Adapt: Multimodal Multiview Human Activity Recognition under Arbitrary View Combinations9 Feb 2026
- 2025Towards Achieving Perfect Multimodal Alignment19 Mar 2025