mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bandit and Delayed Feedback in Online Structured Prediction

arXiv 2502.18709 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online structured prediction is a task of sequentially predicting outputs with complex structures based on inputs and past observations, encompassing online classification. Recent studies showed that in the full-information setting, we can achieve finite bounds on the textitsurrogate regret, textiti.e.,~the extra target loss relative to the best possible surrogate loss. In practice, however, full-information feedback is often unrealistic as it requires immediate access to the whole structure of complex outputs. Motivated by this, we propose algorithms that work with less demanding feedback, textitbandit and textitdelayed feedback. For bandit feedback, by using a standard inverse-weighted gradient estimator, we achieve a surrogate regret bound of O(√KT) for the time horizon T and the size of the output set K. However, K can be extremely large when outputs are highly complex, resulting in an undesirable bound. To address this issue, we propose another algorithm that achieves a surrogate regret bound of O(T2/3), which is independent of K. This is achieved with a carefully designed pseudo-inverse matrix estimator. Furthermore, we numerically compare the performance of these algorithms, as well as existing ones. Regarding delayed feedback, we provide algorithms and regret analyses that cover various scenarios, including full-information and bandit feedback, as well as fixed and variable delays.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

21 of 51 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  2. 2013Online Learning under Delayed Feedbackcited by 137
  3. 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 117
  4. 2016Delay and Cooperation in Nonstochastic Banditscited by 71
  5. 2018SparseMAP: Differentiable Sparse Structured Inferencecited by 62
  6. 2019An Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial Bandits with Arbitrary Delayscited by 44
  7. 2018Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Impropercited by 40
  8. 2020A General Framework for Consistent Structured Prediction with Implicit Loss Embeddingscited by 35
  9. 2016A Consistent Regularization Approach for Structured Predictioncited by 33
  10. 2021Online Learning with Optimism and Delaycited by 33
  11. 2019Top-k Combinatorial Bandits with Full-Bandit Feedbackcited by 28
  12. 2022A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedbackcited by 23
9 more
  1. 2019Structured Prediction with Projection Oraclescited by 21
  2. 2023A Unified Analysis of Nonstochastic Delayed Feedback for Combinatorial Semi-Bandits, Linear Bandits, and MDPscited by 15
  3. 2021Beyond Bandit Feedback in Online Multiclass Classificationcited by 14
  4. 2020Exploiting the Surrogate Gap in Online Multiclass Classificationcited by 9
  5. 2021Frank-Wolfe with a Nearest Extreme Point Oraclecited by 8
  6. 2024Online Structured Prediction with Fenchel--Young Losses and Improved Surrogate Regret for Online Multiclass Classification with Logistic Losscited by 7
  7. 2017Efficient Online Bandit Multiclass Learning with tildeO(√T) Regretcited by 6
  8. 2024The Pivoting Framework: Frank-Wolfe Algorithms with Active Set Size Controlcited by 3
  9. 2022Delaytron: Efficient Learning of Multiclass Classifiers with Delayed Bandit Feedbackscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.