mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Non-Stationary Online Structured Prediction with Surrogate Losses

arXiv 2510.07086 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online structured prediction, including online classification as a special case, is the task of sequentially predicting labels from input features. In this setting, the surrogate regret -- the cumulative excess of the actual target loss (e.g., the 0-1 loss) over the surrogate loss (e.g., the logistic loss) incurred by the best fixed estimator -- has gained attention because it admits a finite bound independent of the time horizon T. However, such guarantees break down in non-stationary environments, where every fixed estimator may incur surrogate loss that grows linearly with T. To address this limitation, we obtain an upper bound of FT + O(1 + PT) on the cumulative target loss, where FT is the cumulative surrogate loss of any comparator sequence and PT is its path length. This bound depends on T only through FT and PT, thus offering stronger guarantees under non-stationarity. Our core idea is to combine the dynamic regret analysis of online gradient descent (OGD) with the exploit-the-surrogate-gap technique. This viewpoint sheds light on the usefulness of a Polyak-style learning rate for OGD, which systematically yields target-loss bounds and performs well empirically. We then extend our approach to broader settings beyond prior work via the convolutional Fenchel--Young loss. Finally, a lower bound shows that the dependence on FT and PT is tight.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

26 of 44 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 407
  3. 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
  4. 2018Adaptive Online Learning in Dynamic Environmentscited by 130
  5. 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 117
  6. 2015Strongly Adaptive Online Learningcited by 102
  7. 2020Dynamic Regret of Convex and Smooth Functionscited by 90
  8. 2015On the Global Linear Convergence of Frank-Wolfe Optimization Variantscited by 76
  9. 2021Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimizationcited by 66
  10. 2018SparseMAP: Differentiable Sparse Structured Inferencecited by 62
  11. 2022Dynamics of SGD with Stochastic Polyak Stepsizes: Truly Adaptive Variants and Convergence to Exact Solutioncited by 40
  12. 2020A General Framework for Consistent Structured Prediction with Implicit Loss Embeddingscited by 35
14 more
  1. 2016A Consistent Regularization Approach for Structured Predictioncited by 33
  2. 2023Adaptive SGD with Polyak stepsize and Line-search: Robust Convergence and Variance Reductioncited by 23
  3. 2019Structured Prediction with Projection Oraclescited by 21
  4. 2021Beyond Bandit Feedback in Online Multiclass Classificationcited by 14
  5. 2015Linearly Convergent Away-Step Conditional Gradient for Non-strongly Convex Functionscited by 12
  6. 2020Exploiting the Surrogate Gap in Online Multiclass Classificationcited by 9
  7. 2023A Stability Principle for Learning under Non-Stationaritycited by 9
  8. 2021Frank-Wolfe with a Nearest Extreme Point Oraclecited by 8
  9. 2022Learning Energy Networks with Generalized Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 8
  10. 2024Online Structured Prediction with Fenchel--Young Losses and Improved Surrogate Regret for Online Multiclass Classification with Logistic Losscited by 7
  11. 2024The Pivoting Framework: Frank-Wolfe Algorithms with Active Set Size Controlcited by 3
  12. 2024Structured Prediction in Online Learningcited by 2
  13. 2025Establishing Linear Surrogate Regret Bounds for Convex Smooth Losses via Convolutional Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 2
  14. 2025Bandit and Delayed Feedback in Online Structured Predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.