mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Hardware Impact of Quantization and Pruning for Weights in Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv 2302.04174 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Energy efficient implementations and deployments of Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have been of great interest due to the possibility of developing artificial systems that can achieve the computational powers and energy efficiency of the biological brain. Efficient implementations of SNNs on modern digital hardware are also inspired by advances in machine learning and deep neural networks (DNNs). Two techniques widely employed in the efficient deployment of DNNs -- the quantization and pruning of parameters, can both compress the model size, reduce memory footprints, and facilitate low-latency execution. The interaction between quantization and pruning and how they might impact model performance on SNN accelerators is currently unknown. We study various combinations of pruning and quantization in isolation, cumulatively, and simultaneously (jointly) to a state-of-the-art SNN targeting gesture recognition for dynamic vision sensor cameras (DVS). We show that this state-of-the-art model is amenable to aggressive parameter quantization, not suffering from any loss in accuracy down to ternary weights. However, pruning only maintains iso-accuracy up to 80% sparsity, which results in 45% more energy than the best quantization on our architectural model. Applying both pruning and quantization can result in an accuracy loss to offer a favourable trade-off on the energy-accuracy Pareto-frontier for the given hardware configuration.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2023.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
  2. 2019HAWQ-V2: Hessian Aware trace-Weighted Quantization of Neural Networkscited by 250
  3. 2016Training Deep Spiking Neural Networks using Backpropagationcited by 203
  4. 2018Discrimination-aware Channel Pruning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 171
  5. 2019The Heidelberg spiking datasets for the systematic evaluation of spiking neural networkscited by 135
  6. 2021Network Quantization with Element-wise Gradient Scalingcited by 82
  7. 2020PROFIT: A Novel Training Method for sub-4-bit MobileNet Modelscited by 50
  8. 2017STDP Based Pruning of Connections and Weight Quantization in Spiking Neural Networks for Energy Efficient Recognitioncited by 41
  9. 2021Pruning of Deep Spiking Neural Networks through Gradient Rewiringcited by 41
  10. 2019Optimizing the energy consumption of spiking neural networks for neuromorphic applicationscited by 34
  11. 2021Q-SpiNN: A Framework for Quantizing Spiking Neural Networkscited by 33
  12. 2022TCJA-SNN: Temporal-Channel Joint Attention for Spiking Neural Networkscited by 33
3 more
  1. 2021Spatio-Temporal Pruning and Quantization for Low-latency Spiking Neural Networkscited by 16
  2. 2022The fine line between dead neurons and sparsity in binarized spiking neural networkscited by 7
  3. 2021Hessian Aware Quantization of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.