TrustChain: A Blockchain Framework for Auditing and Verifying Aggregators in Decentralized Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The server-less nature of Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) requires allocating the aggregation role to specific participants in each federated round. Current DFL architectures ensure the trustworthiness of the aggregator node upon selection. However, most of these studies overlook the possibility that the aggregating node may turn rogue and act maliciously after being nominated. To address this problem, this paper proposes a DFL structure, called TrustChain, that scores the aggregators before selection based on their past behavior and additionally audits them after the aggregation. To do this, the statistical independence between the client updates and the aggregated model is continuously monitored using the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC). The proposed method relies on several principles, including blockchain, anomaly detection, and concept drift analysis. The designed structure is evaluated on several federated datasets and attack scenarios with different numbers of Byzantine nodes.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2025.
Builds on
23 of 44 references.
References · 23
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 672
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 351
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 309
- 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 149
- 2019BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 117
- 2019Reliable Federated Learning for Mobile Networkscited by 92
11 more
- 2019Peer-to-peer Federated Learning on Graphscited by 85
- 2020A Blockchain-based Decentralized Federated Learning Framework with Committee Consensuscited by 84
- 2019BAFFLE : Blockchain Based Aggregator Free Federated Learningcited by 38
- 2024Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey on Security and Privacycited by 25
- 2020BlockFLA: Accountable Federated Learning via Hybrid Blockchain Architecturecited by 20
- 2019PIRATE: A Blockchain-based Secure Framework of Distributed Machine Learning in 5G Networkscited by 18
- 2022Towards Verifiable Federated Learningcited by 11
- 2022BEAS: Blockchain Enabled Asynchronous & Secure Federated Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2022Advancing Blockchain-based Federated Learning through Verifiable Off-chain Computationscited by 7
- 2023DePRL: Achieving Linear Convergence Speedup in Personalized Decentralized Learning with Shared Representationscited by 5
- 2025VerifBFL: Leveraging zk-SNARKs for A Verifiable Blockchained Federated Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.