Cross-Model Transferability of Adversarial Patches in Real-time Segmentation for Autonomous Driving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial attacks pose a significant threat to deep learning models, particularly in safety-critical applications like healthcare and autonomous driving. Recently, patch based attacks have demonstrated effectiveness in real-time inference scenarios owing to their 'drag and drop' nature. Following this idea for Semantic Segmentation (SS), here we propose a novel Expectation Over Transformation (EOT) based adversarial patch attack that is more realistic for autonomous vehicles. To effectively train this attack we also propose a 'simplified' loss function that is easy to analyze and implement. Using this attack as our basis, we investigate whether adversarial patches once optimized on a specific SS model, can fool other models or architectures. We conduct a comprehensive cross-model transferability analysis of adversarial patches trained on SOTA Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models such PIDNet-S, PIDNet-M and PIDNet-L, among others. Additionally, we also include the Segformer model to study transferability to Vision Transformers (ViTs). All of our analysis is conducted on the widely used Cityscapes dataset. Our study reveals key insights into how model architectures (CNN vs CNN or CNN vs. Transformer-based) influence attack susceptibility. In particular, we conclude that although the transferability (effectiveness) of attacks on unseen images of any dimension is really high, the attacks trained against one particular model are minimally effective on other models. And this was found to be true for both ViT and CNN based models. Additionally our results also indicate that for CNN-based models, the repercussions of patch attacks are local, unlike ViTs. Per-class analysis reveals that simple-classes like 'sky' suffer less misclassification than others. The code for the project is available at: https://github.com/p-shekhar/adversarial-patch-transferability
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2025.
Builds on
18 of 27 references.
References · 18
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
- 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 653
- 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
- 2020BiSeNet V2: Bilateral Network with Guided Aggregation for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 294
- 2017ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Imagescited by 261
- 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
- 2022PIDNet: A Real-time Semantic Segmentation Network Inspired by PID Controllerscited by 84
- 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 65
6 more
- 2022A Survey on Graph Neural Networks and Graph Transformers in Computer Vision: A Task-Oriented Perspectivecited by 56
- 2024One Perturbation is Enough: On Generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations against Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 39
- 2022On the Real-World Adversarial Robustness of Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 30
- 2022Proximal Splitting Adversarial Attacks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 23
- 2023Revisiting Evaluation Metrics for Semantic Segmentation: Optimization and Evaluation of Fine-grained Intersection over Unioncited by 17
- 2022Mixture Domain Adaptation to Improve Semantic Segmentation in Real-World Surveillancecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.