mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Maturity Framework for Enhancing Machine Learning Quality

arXiv 2502.15758 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.CY cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid integration of Machine Learning (ML) in business applications and processes, it is crucial to ensure the quality, reliability and reproducibility of such systems. We suggest a methodical approach towards ML system quality assessment and introduce a structured Maturity framework for governance of ML. We emphasize the importance of quality in ML and the need for rigorous assessment, driven by issues in ML governance and gaps in existing frameworks. Our primary contribution is a comprehensive open-sourced quality assessment method, validated with empirical evidence, accompanied by a systematic maturity framework tailored to ML systems. Drawing from applied experience at Booking.com, we discuss challenges and lessons learned during large-scale adoption within organizations. The study presents empirical findings, highlighting quality improvement trends and showcasing business outcomes. The maturity framework for ML systems, aims to become a valuable resource to reshape industry standards and enable a structural approach to improve ML maturity in any organization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.

Builds on

24 of 79 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 152
  4. 2023Tree-Structured Parzen Estimator: Understanding Its Algorithm Components and Their Roles for Better Empirical Performancecited by 147
  5. 2022Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecturecited by 128
  6. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  7. 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 84
  8. 2020ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learningcited by 70
  9. 2020Towards CRISP-ML(Q): A Machine Learning Process Model with Quality Assurance Methodologycited by 41
  10. 2020Adoption and Effects of Software Engineering Best Practices in Machine Learningcited by 33
  11. 2020A Software Engineering Perspective on Engineering Machine Learning Systems: State of the Art and Challengescited by 33
  12. 2021E-Commerce Promotions Personalization via Online Multiple-Choice Knapsack with Uplift Modelingcited by 21
12 more
  1. 2015Efficient Machine Learning for Big Data: A Reviewcited by 17
  2. 2018Characterizing machine learning process: A maturity frameworkcited by 8
  3. 2022MuMIC -- Multimodal Embedding for Multi-label Image Classification with Tempered Sigmoidcited by 8
  4. 2022Deepchecks: A Library for Testing and Validating Machine Learning Models and Datacited by 7
  5. 2017Democratizing online controlled experiments at Booking.comcited by 6
  6. 2020Quality Management of Machine Learning Systemscited by 6
  7. 2023Text2Topic: Multi-Label Text Classification System for Efficient Topic Detection in User Generated Content with Zero-Shot Capabilitiescited by 6
  8. 2021Impact of Response Latency on User Behaviour in Mobile Web Searchcited by 4
  9. 2021Quality Assurance Challenges for Machine Learning Software Applications During Software Development Life Cycle Phasescited by 4
  10. 2014A Review of Software Quality Models for the Evaluation of Software Productscited by 3
  11. 2021Mining the Stars: Learning Quality Ratings with User-facing Explanations for Vacation Rentalscited by 2
  12. 2021With One Voice: Composing a Travel Voice Assistant from Re-purposed Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.