mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Impact and Feasibility of Self-Confidence Shaping for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

arXiv 2502.14311 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2025cs.HC cs.CL cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In AI-assisted decision-making, it is crucial but challenging for humans to appropriately rely on AI, especially in high-stakes domains such as finance and healthcare. This paper addresses this problem from a human-centered perspective by presenting an intervention for self-confidence shaping, designed to calibrate self-confidence at a targeted level. We first demonstrate the impact of self-confidence shaping by quantifying the upper-bound improvement in human-AI team performance. Our behavioral experiments with 121 participants show that self-confidence shaping can improve human-AI team performance by nearly 50% by mitigating both over- and under-reliance on AI. We then introduce a self-confidence prediction task to identify when our intervention is needed. Our results show that simple machine-learning models achieve 67% accuracy in predicting self-confidence. We further illustrate the feasibility of such interventions. The observed relationship between sentiment and self-confidence suggests that modifying sentiment could be a viable strategy for shaping self-confidence. Finally, we outline future research directions to support the deployment of self-confidence shaping in a real-world scenario for effective human-AI collaboration.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

Builds on

13 of 33 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
  3. 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
  4. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 190
  5. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  6. 2023Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanationscited by 83
  7. 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
  8. 2022ECTSum: A New Benchmark Dataset For Bullet Point Summarization of Long Earnings Call Transcriptscited by 59
  9. 2021Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactionscited by 35
  10. 2022Uncalibrated Models Can Improve Human-AI Collaborationcited by 26
  11. 2024"Are You Really Sure?" Understanding the Effects of Human Self-Confidence Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 26
  12. 2019Modeling financial analysts' decision making via the pragmatics and semantics of earnings callscited by 17
1 more
  1. 2024Utilizing Human Behavior Modeling to Manipulate Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision Making: The Good, the Bad, and the Scarycited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.