mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Human-Centric Reflective Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making

arXiv 2607.03025 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse areas of human activity-ranging from everyday tasks to safety-critical applications-aims to enhance decision-making effectiveness with minimal human feedback. Concurrently, it seeks to align decisions with human expectations, preferences, and needs while mitigating risks associated with AI non-determinism. However, humans frequently over- or under-rely on AI recommendations, and current AI systems remain poorly calibrated to human expectations. To address these challenges, we introduce a human-AI collaborative decision-making framework designed to augment human capabilities and align AI agents with human preferences and expectations. Specifically, this paper (a) formulates the collaborative decision-making task as a stochastic game between an AI agent and a human player, and (b) proposes the Human-Centric Reflective Architecture (HCRA), which integrates human-calibrated models with reinforcement learning agents that leverage linguistic feedback in an iterative, reflective process. Evaluation results demonstrate that HCRA enhances decision-making effectiveness and delivers high-quality recommendations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 29 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  5. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  6. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
  7. 2020Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systemscited by 138
  8. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Interactive LLM Agentscited by 103
  9. 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
  10. 2021Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Makingcited by 58
  11. 2021Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactionscited by 35
  12. 2023Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 28
2 more
  1. 2024Utilizing Human Behavior Modeling to Manipulate Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision Making: The Good, the Bad, and the Scarycited by 9
  2. 2025The Impact and Feasibility of Self-Confidence Shaping for AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.