mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Learning Under Irreversible Dynamics via Asking for Help

arXiv 2502.14043 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most learning algorithms with formal regret guarantees essentially rely on trying all possible behaviors, which is problematic when some errors cannot be recovered from. Instead, we allow the learning agent to ask for help from a mentor and to transfer knowledge between similar states. We show that this combination enables the agent to learn both safely and effectively. Under standard online learning assumptions, we provide an algorithm whose regret and number of mentor queries are both sublinear in the time horizon for Markov decision processes with irreversible dynamics and infinite state spaces. Our proof involves a sequence of three reductions, making our result more general than a single algorithm. Conceptually, our result may be the first formal proof that it is possible for an agent to obtain high reward while becoming self-sufficient in an unknown, unbounded, and high-stakes environment without resets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.

Builds on

23 of 75 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  2. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  3. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  4. 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
  5. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  6. 2020Almost Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning via Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 127
  7. 2021Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPscited by 78
  8. 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 69
  9. 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversariescited by 57
  10. 2022Smoothed Online Learning is as Easy as Statistical Learningcited by 50
  11. 2023State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 48
  12. 2020Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPscited by 42
11 more
  1. 2022Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarkingcited by 31
  2. 2017Online Learning with Abstentioncited by 28
  3. 2023TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AIcited by 25
  4. 2020Regret Bounds for Discounted MDPscited by 19
  5. 2013Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  6. 2024Learning Adversarial MDPs with Stochastic Hard Constraintscited by 15
  7. 2018Enabling Pedestrian Safety using Computer Vision Techniques: A Case Study of the 2018 Uber Inc. Self-driving Car Crashcited by 13
  8. 2020Pessimism About Unknown Unknowns Inspires Conservatismcited by 13
  9. 2020Curiosity Killed or Incapacitated the Cat and the Asymptotically Optimal Agentcited by 6
  10. 2024Avoiding Catastrophe in Online Learning by Asking for Helpcited by 4
  11. 2019Delegative Reinforcement Learning: learning to avoid traps with a little helpcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.