mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Avoiding Catastrophe in Online Learning by Asking for Help

arXiv 2402.08062 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most learning algorithms with formal regret guarantees assume that all mistakes are recoverable and essentially rely on trying all possible behaviors. This approach is problematic when some mistakes are "catastrophic", i.e., irreparable. We propose an online learning problem where the goal is to minimize the chance of catastrophe. Specifically, we assume that the payoff in each round represents the chance of avoiding catastrophe in that round and try to maximize the product of payoffs (the overall chance of avoiding catastrophe) while allowing a limited number of queries to a mentor. We also assume that the agent can transfer knowledge between similar inputs. We first show that in general, any algorithm either queries the mentor at a linear rate or is nearly guaranteed to cause catastrophe. However, in settings where the mentor policy class is learnable in the standard online model, we provide an algorithm whose regret and rate of querying the mentor both approach 0 as the time horizon grows. Although our focus is the product of payoffs, we provide matching bounds for the typical additive regret. Conceptually, if a policy class is learnable in the absence of catastrophic risk, it is learnable in the presence of catastrophic risk if the agent can ask for help.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

19 of 60 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  2. 2017Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learningcited by 500
  3. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  4. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  5. 2017Inverse Reward Designcited by 246
  6. 2023An Overview of Catastrophic AI Riskscited by 214
  7. 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 207
  8. 2021Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPscited by 78
  9. 2016Safe Exploration in Finite Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processescited by 72
  10. 2021Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversariescited by 57
  11. 2022Smoothed Online Learning is as Easy as Statistical Learningcited by 50
  12. 2023TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AIcited by 25
7 more
  1. 2021There Is No Turning Back: A Self-Supervised Approach for Reversibility-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  2. 2022Fairness and Welfare Quantification for Regret in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 17
  3. 2018Enabling Pedestrian Safety using Computer Vision Techniques: A Case Study of the 2018 Uber Inc. Self-driving Car Crashcited by 13
  4. 2020Pessimism About Unknown Unknowns Inspires Conservatismcited by 13
  5. 2018Active Inverse Reward Designcited by 12
  6. 2020Curiosity Killed or Incapacitated the Cat and the Asymptotically Optimal Agentcited by 6
  7. 2019Delegative Reinforcement Learning: learning to avoid traps with a little helpcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.