CARE: Confidence-Aware Regression Estimation of building density fine-tuning EO Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performing accurate confidence quantification and assessment in pixel-wise regression tasks, which are downstream applications of AI Foundation Models for Earth Observation (EO), is important for deep neural networks to predict their failures, improve their performance and enhance their capabilities in real-world applications, for their practical deployment. For pixel-wise regression tasks, specifically utilizing remote sensing data from satellite imagery in EO Foundation Models, confidence quantification is a critical challenge. The focus of this research work is on developing a Foundation Model using EO satellite data that computes and assigns a confidence metric alongside regression outputs to improve the reliability and interpretability of predictions generated by deep neural networks. To this end, we develop, train and evaluate the proposed Confidence-Aware Regression Estimation (CARE) Foundation Model. Our model CARE computes and assigns confidence to regression results as downstream tasks of a Foundation Model for EO data, and performs a confidence-aware self-corrective learning method for the low-confidence regions. We evaluate the model CARE, and experimental results on multi-spectral data from the Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellite constellation to estimate the building density (i.e. monitoring urban growth), show that the proposed method can be successfully applied to important regression problems in EO and remote sensing. We also show that our model CARE outperforms other baseline methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2025.
Builds on
21 of 44 references.
References · 21
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 355
- 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
- 2023Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 149
- 2024Rethinking Transformers Pre-training for Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 83
- 2024AnySat: One Earth Observation Model for Many Resolutions, Scales, and Modalitiescited by 74
- 2024OmniSat: Self-Supervised Modality Fusion for Earth Observationcited by 63
- 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
9 more
- 2024One for All: Toward Unified Foundation Models for Earth Visioncited by 34
- 2024PhilEO Bench: Evaluating Geo-Spatial Foundation Modelscited by 25
- 2021Multivariate Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 23
- 2024Conformal Prediction via Regression-as-Classificationcited by 18
- 2023Semi-Supervised Deep Regression with Uncertainty Consistency and Variational Model Ensembling via Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2016Efficient Optimization for Rank-based Loss Functionscited by 15
- 2024Evaluating and Benchmarking Foundation Models for Earth Observation and Geospatial AIcited by 8
- 2021Boundary of Distribution Support Generator (BDSG): Sample Generation on the Boundarycited by 6
- 2021Robust Neural Regression via Uncertainty Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.