Learning Counterfactually Fair Models via Improved Generation with Neural Causal Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of the main concerns while deploying machine learning models in real-world applications is fairness. Counterfactual fairness has emerged as an intuitive and natural definition of fairness. However, existing methodologies for enforcing counterfactual fairness seem to have two limitations: (i) generating counterfactual samples faithful to the underlying causal graph, and (ii) as we argue in this paper, existing regularizers are mere proxies and do not directly enforce the exact definition of counterfactual fairness. In this work, our aim is to mitigate both issues. Firstly, we propose employing Neural Causal Models (NCMs) for generating the counterfactual samples. For implementing the abduction step in NCMs, the posteriors of the exogenous variables need to be estimated given a counterfactual query, as they are not readily available. As a consequence, L3 consistency with respect to the underlying causal graph cannot be guaranteed in practice due to the estimation errors involved. To mitigate this issue, we propose a novel kernel least squares loss term that enforces the L3 constraints explicitly. Thus, we obtain an improved counterfactual generation suitable for the counterfactual fairness task. Secondly, we propose a new MMD-based regularizer term that explicitly enforces the counterfactual fairness conditions into the base model while training. We show an improved trade-off between counterfactual fairness and generalization over existing baselines on synthetic and benchmark datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
26 of 38 references.
References · 26
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 370
- 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 364
- 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
- 2019Causality for Machine Learningcited by 243
- 2019Universal Approximation with Deep Narrow Networkscited by 200
- 2021The Causal-Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inferencecited by 98
- 2022Causal Machine Learning for Healthcare and Precision Medicinecited by 68
- 2022Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimationcited by 57
- 2023Counterfactual Identifiability of Bijective Causal Modelscited by 43
- 2021Transport-based Counterfactual Modelscited by 27
14 more
- 2021Wasserstein Generative Learning of Conditional Distributioncited by 24
- 2023Modeling Causal Mechanisms with Diffusion Models for Interventional and Counterfactual Queriescited by 24
- 2023Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Changecited by 23
- 2024Neural Causal Abstractionscited by 21
- 2022Counterfactual Fairness with Partially Known Causal Graphcited by 20
- 2023Causal Context Connects Counterfactual Fairness to Robust Prediction and Group Fairnesscited by 17
- 2020Adversarial Learning for Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 14
- 2023Partial Counterfactual Identification of Continuous Outcomes with a Curvature Sensitivity Modelcited by 14
- 2023Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Datacited by 13
- 2023Towards Counterfactual Fairness-aware Domain Generalization in Changing Environmentscited by 8
- 2024Learning Structural Causal Models through Deep Generative Models: Methods, Guarantees, and Challengescited by 8
- 2024Counterfactual Fairness by Combining Factual and Counterfactual Predictionscited by 8
- 2021An Optimal Transport Approach to Estimating Causal Effects via Nonlinear Difference-in-Differencescited by 7
- 2023Consistent Optimal Transport with Empirical Conditional Measurescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.