Boosting Illuminant Estimation in Deep Color Constancy through Enhancing Brightness Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Color constancy estimates illuminant chromaticity to correct color-biased images. Recently, Deep Neural Network-driven Color Constancy (DNNCC) models have made substantial advancements. Nevertheless, the potential risks in DNNCC due to the vulnerability of deep neural networks have not yet been explored. In this paper, we conduct the first investigation into the impact of a key factor in color constancy-brightness-on DNNCC from a robustness perspective. Our evaluation reveals that several mainstream DNNCC models exhibit high sensitivity to brightness despite their focus on chromaticity estimation. This sheds light on a potential limitation of existing DNNCC models: their sensitivity to brightness may hinder performance given the widespread brightness variations in real-world datasets. From the insights of our analysis, we propose a simple yet effective brightness robustness enhancement strategy for DNNCC models, termed BRE. The core of BRE is built upon the adaptive step-size adversarial brightness augmentation technique, which identifies high-risk brightness variation and generates augmented images via explicit brightness adjustment. Subsequently, BRE develops a brightness-robustness-aware model optimization strategy that integrates adversarial brightness training and brightness contrastive loss, significantly bolstering the brightness robustness of DNNCC models. BRE is hyperparameter-free and can be integrated into existing DNNCC models, without incurring additional overhead during the testing phase. Experiments on two public color constancy datasets-ColorChecker and Cube+-demonstrate that the proposed BRE consistently enhances the illuminant estimation performance of existing DNNCC models, reducing the estimation error by an average of 5.04% across six mainstream DNNCC models, underscoring the critical role of enhancing brightness robustness in these models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
23 of 50 references.
References · 23
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 196
- 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
- 2018Deep Defense: Training DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustnesscited by 41
- 2016Fast Fourier Color Constancycited by 37
11 more
- 2019What Else Can Fool Deep Learning? Addressing Color Constancy Errors on Deep Neural Network Performancecited by 37
- 2020Cross-Camera Convolutional Color Constancycited by 30
- 2021CLCC: Contrastive Learning for Color Constancycited by 29
- 2019On Finding Gray Pixelscited by 26
- 2019Cascading Convolutional Color Constancycited by 22
- 2015Color Constancy Using CNNscited by 21
- 2017Unsupervised Learning for Color Constancycited by 19
- 2020A Multi-Hypothesis Approach to Color Constancycited by 18
- 2015Single and Multiple Illuminant Estimation Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2019Bag of Color Features For Color Constancycited by 11
- 2022Learning Enriched Illuminants for Cross and Single Sensor Color Constancycited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.