mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Novel Unified Parametric Assumption for Nonconvex Optimization

arXiv 2502.12329 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nonconvex optimization is central to modern machine learning, but the general framework of nonconvex optimization yields weak convergence guarantees that are too pessimistic compared to practice. On the other hand, while convexity enables efficient optimization, it is of limited applicability to many practical problems. To bridge this gap and better understand the practical success of optimization algorithms in nonconvex settings, we introduce a novel unified parametric assumption. Our assumption is general enough to encompass a broad class of nonconvex functions while also being specific enough to enable the derivation of a unified convergence theorem for gradient-based methods. Notably, by tuning the parameters of our assumption, we demonstrate its versatility in recovering several existing function classes as special cases and in identifying functions amenable to efficient optimization. We derive our convergence theorem for both deterministic and stochastic optimization, and conduct experiments to verify that our assumption can hold practically over optimization trajectories.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.

Builds on

19 of 25 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 341
  5. 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 233
  6. 2020Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex Worldcited by 158
  7. 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
  8. 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points Icited by 126
  9. 2016Gradient Descent Learns Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 79
  10. 2018Escaping Saddles with Stochastic Gradientscited by 66
  11. 2022The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variancecited by 61
  12. 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methodscited by 58
7 more
  1. 2023Toward Understanding Why Adam Converges Faster Than SGD for Transformerscited by 53
  2. 2022Dynamics of SGD with Stochastic Polyak Stepsizes: Truly Adaptive Variants and Convergence to Exact Solutioncited by 40
  3. 2023Aiming towards the minimizers: fast convergence of SGD for overparametrized problemscited by 22
  4. 2023Trust Region Methods For Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization Beyond Lipschitz Smoothnesscited by 8
  5. 2024Loss Landscape Characterization of Neural Networks without Over-Parametrizationcited by 8
  6. 2023Non-Uniform Smoothness for Gradient Descentcited by 5
  7. 2020A Note on Nesterov's Accelerated Method in Nonconvex Optimization: a Weak Estimate Sequence Approachcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.