SAMRI-2: A Memory-based Model for Cartilage and Meniscus Segmentation in 3D MRIs of the Knee Joint
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate morphometric assessment of cartilage-such as thickness/volume-via MRI is essential for monitoring knee osteoarthritis. Segmenting cartilage remains challenging and dependent on extensive expert-annotated datasets, which are heavily subjected to inter-reader variability. Recent advancements in Visual Foundational Models (VFM), especially memory-based approaches, offer opportunities for improving generalizability and robustness. This study introduces a deep learning (DL) method for cartilage and meniscus segmentation from 3D MRIs using interactive, memory-based VFMs. To improve spatial awareness and convergence, we incorporated a Hybrid Shuffling Strategy (HSS) during training and applied a segmentation mask propagation technique to enhance annotation efficiency. We trained four AI models-a CNN-based 3D-VNet, two automatic transformer-based models (SaMRI2D and SaMRI3D), and a transformer-based promptable memory-based VFM (SAMRI-2)-on 3D knee MRIs from 270 patients using public and internal datasets and evaluated on 57 external cases, including multi-radiologist annotations and different data acquisitions. Model performance was assessed against reference standards using Dice Score (DSC) and Intersection over Union (IoU), with additional morphometric evaluations to further quantify segmentation accuracy. SAMRI-2 model, trained with HSS, outperformed all other models, achieving an average DSC improvement of 5 points, with a peak improvement of 12 points for tibial cartilage. It also demonstrated the lowest cartilage thickness errors, reducing discrepancies by up to threefold. Notably, SAMRI-2 maintained high performance with as few as three user clicks per volume, reducing annotation effort while ensuring anatomical precision. This memory-based VFM with spatial awareness offers a novel approach for reliable AI-assisted knee MRI segmentation, advancing DL in musculoskeletal imaging.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.
Builds on
12 of 24 references.
References · 12
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,195
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,820
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,287
- 2023Medical SAM Adapter: Adapting Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 487
- 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
- 2023Segment Anything in Medical Imagescited by 227
- 2021Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object Segmentationcited by 202
- 2016Deep Interactive Object Selectioncited by 160
- 2023SAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Imagescited by 102
- 2021iSegFormer: Interactive Segmentation via Transformers with Application to 3D Knee MR Imagescited by 28
- 2024Is SAM 2 Better than SAM in Medical Image Segmentation?cited by 16
- 2020The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Datasetcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.