A Novel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Counterfactual Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning algorithms that learn black-box predictive models (which cannot be directly interpreted) are increasingly used to make predictions affecting the lives of people. It is important that users understand the predictions of such models, particularly when the model outputs a negative prediction for the user (e.g. denying a loan). Counterfactual explanations provide users with guidance on how to change some of their characteristics to receive a different, positive classification by a predictive model. For example, if a predictive model rejected a loan application from a user, a counterfactual explanation might state: If your salary was pounds50,000 (rather than your current pounds35,000), then your loan would be approved. This paper proposes two novel contributions: (a) a novel multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) for counterfactual generation based on lexicographic optimisation, rather than the more popular Pareto dominance approach; and (b) an extension to the definition of the objective of validity for a counterfactual, based on measuring the resilience of a counterfactual to violations of monotonicity constraints which are intuitively expected by users; e.g., intuitively, the probability of a loan application to be approved would monotonically increase with an increase in the salary of the applicant. Experiments involving 15 experimental settings (3 types of black box models times 5 datasets) have shown that the proposed lexicographic optimisation-based EA is very competitive with an existing Pareto dominance-based EA; and the proposed extension of the validity objective has led to a substantial increase in the validity of the counterfactuals generated by the proposed EA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
10 of 32 references.
References · 10
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,137
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,992
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,088
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 328
- 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
- 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
- 2021GeCo: Quality Counterfactual Explanations in Real Timecited by 32
- 2018Monotonic classification: an overview on algorithms, performance measures and data setscited by 18
Built on by
Not cited yet.