mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Force Matching with Relativistic Constraints: A Physics-Inspired Approach to Stable and Efficient Generative Modeling

arXiv 2502.08150 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 12

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces Force Matching (ForM), a novel framework for generative modeling that represents an initial exploration into leveraging special relativistic mechanics to enhance the stability of the sampling process. By incorporating the Lorentz factor, ForM imposes a velocity constraint, ensuring that sample velocities remain bounded within a constant limit. This constraint serves as a fundamental mechanism for stabilizing the generative dynamics, leading to a more robust and controlled sampling process. We provide a rigorous theoretical analysis demonstrating that the velocity constraint is preserved throughout the sampling procedure within the ForM framework. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct extensive empirical evaluations. On the textithalf-moons dataset, ForM significantly outperforms baseline methods, achieving the lowest Euclidean distance loss of 0.714, in contrast to vanilla first-order flow matching (5.853) and first- and second-order flow matching (5.793). Additionally, we perform an ablation study to further investigate the impact of our velocity constraint, reaffirming the superiority of ForM in stabilizing the generative process. The theoretical guarantees and empirical results underscore the potential of integrating special relativity principles into generative modeling. Our findings suggest that ForM provides a promising pathway toward achieving stable, efficient, and flexible generative processes. This work lays the foundation for future advancements in high-dimensional generative modeling, opening new avenues for the application of physical principles in machine learning.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 33 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.

Builds on

33 of 63 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 32

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  4. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
  5. 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
  6. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  7. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
  8. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
  9. 2024Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Predictioncited by 1,023
  10. 2016Pixel Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 816
  11. 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 784
  12. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
20 more
  1. 2023Analyzing and Improving the Training Dynamics of Diffusion Modelscited by 402
  2. 2024Simplifying, Stabilizing and Scaling Continuous-Time Consistency Modelscited by 283
  3. 2023Improved Techniques for Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diffusion ODEscited by 54
  4. 2024On Statistical Rates and Provably Efficient Criteria of Latent Diffusion Transformers (DiTs)cited by 40
  5. 2024LazyDiT: Lazy Learning for the Acceleration of Diffusion Transformerscited by 37
  6. 2024Numerical Pruning for Efficient Autoregressive Modelscited by 25
  7. 2024Unraveling the Smoothness Properties of Diffusion Models: A Gaussian Mixture Perspectivecited by 24
  8. 2024OmniControlNet: Dual-stage Integration for Conditional Image Generationcited by 24
  9. 2023Dolfin: Diffusion Layout Transformers without Autoencodercited by 23
  10. 2024Score-based Generative Diffusion Models for Social Recommendationscited by 23
  11. 2024Bayesian Diffusion Models for 3D Shape Reconstructioncited by 19
  12. 2024Looped ReLU MLPs May Be All You Need as Practical Programmable Computerscited by 19
  13. 2024Differential Privacy Mechanisms in Neural Tangent Kernel Regressioncited by 14
  14. 2025On Computational Limits and Provably Efficient Criteria of Visual Autoregressive Models: A Fine-Grained Complexity Analysiscited by 14
  15. 2025Video Latent Flow Matching: Optimal Polynomial Projections for Video Interpolation and Extrapolationcited by 11
  16. 2025Circuit Complexity Bounds for Visual Autoregressive Modelcited by 10
  17. 2025Dissecting Submission Limit in Desk-Rejections: A Mathematical Analysis of Fairness in AI Conference Policiescited by 9
  18. 2025Universal Approximation of Visual Autoregressive Transformerscited by 9
  19. 2023Modeling the Trade-off of Privacy Preservation and Activity Recognition on Low-Resolution Imagescited by 6
  20. 2025RichSpace: Enriching Text-to-Video Prompt Space via Text Embedding Interpolationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 11; 2026: 1.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard Constraints
  2. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraints
  3. 2026Source Anchoring for Physical Consistency in Flow Matching Models
  4. 2025Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems
  5. 2026SNAP-FM: Sparse Nonlinear Accelerated Projection for Physics-Constrained Generative Modeling
  6. 2026A Kinetic Energy Perspective of Flow Matching
  7. 2024Generating Physical Dynamics under Priors
  8. 2026Recursive Flow Matching