mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Effects of Dropout on Performance in Long-range Graph Learning Tasks

arXiv 2502.07364 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) are a class of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that propagate information across the graph via local neighborhoods. The scheme gives rise to two key challenges: over-smoothing and over-squashing. While several Dropout-style algorithms, such as DropEdge and DropMessage, have successfully addressed over-smoothing, their impact on over-squashing remains largely unexplored. This represents a critical gap in the literature, as failure to mitigate over-squashing would make these methods unsuitable for long-range tasks -- the intended use case of deep MPNNs. In this work, we study the aforementioned algorithms, and closely related edge-dropping algorithms -- DropNode, DropAgg and DropGNN -- in the context of over-squashing. We present theoretical results showing that DropEdge-variants reduce sensitivity between distant nodes, limiting their suitability for long-range tasks. To address this, we introduce DropSens, a sensitivity-aware variant of DropEdge that explicitly controls the proportion of information lost due to edge-dropping, thereby increasing sensitivity to distant nodes despite dropping the same number of edges. Our experiments on long-range synthetic and real-world datasets confirm the predicted limitations of existing edge-dropping and feature-dropping methods. Moreover, DropSens consistently outperforms graph rewiring techniques designed to mitigate over-squashing, suggesting that simple, targeted modifications can substantially improve a model's ability to capture long-range interactions. Our conclusions highlight the need to re-evaluate and re-design existing methods for training deep GNNs, with a renewed focus on modelling long-range interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

64 of 103 references.

References · 64

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  5. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  6. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  7. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  8. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  9. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  10. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  11. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
  12. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
38 more
  1. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
  2. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,138
  3. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
  4. 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
  5. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 877
  6. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 860
  7. 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 826
  8. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
  9. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
  10. 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 680
  11. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
  12. 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 584
  13. 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 548
  14. 2019DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?cited by 527
  15. 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 478
  16. 2019PairNorm: Tackling Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 297
  17. 2020Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networkscited by 296
  18. 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 263
  19. 2020Wiki-CS: A Wikipedia-Based Benchmark for Graph Neural Networkscited by 260
  20. 2023A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networkscited by 247
  21. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  22. 2020Graph Random Neural Network for Semi-Supervised Learning on Graphscited by 213
  23. 2022Representing Long-Range Context for Graph Neural Networks with Global Attentioncited by 195
  24. 2023On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topologycited by 166
  25. 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
  26. 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
  27. 2017Predicting multicellular function through multi-layer tissue networkscited by 138
  28. 2020When Does Self-Supervision Help Graph Convolutional Networks?cited by 121
  29. 2021DropGNN: Random Dropouts Increase the Expressiveness of Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
  30. 2020Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networks with Differentiable Group Normalizationcited by 114
  31. 2018Large-Scale Learnable Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 113
  32. 2022FoSR: First-order spectral rewiring for addressing oversquashing in GNNscited by 105
  33. 2021Dirichlet Energy Constrained Learning for Deep Graph Neural Networkscited by 97
  34. 2023Understanding Oversquashing in GNNs through the Lens of Effective Resistancecited by 97
  35. 2017Geometric Matrix Completion with Recurrent Multi-Graph Neural Networkscited by 88
  36. 2023DRew: Dynamically Rewired Message Passing with Delaycited by 82
  37. 2020Bayesian Graph Neural Networks with Adaptive Connection Samplingcited by 81
  38. 2021New Benchmarks for Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphscited by 81

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.