Adaptive Prompting: Ad-hoc Prompt Composition for Social Bias Detection
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances on instruction fine-tuning have led to the development of various prompting techniques for large language models, such as explicit reasoning steps. However, the success of techniques depends on various parameters, such as the task, language model, and context provided. Finding an effective prompt is, therefore, often a trial-and-error process. Most existing approaches to automatic prompting aim to optimize individual techniques instead of compositions of techniques and their dependence on the input. To fill this gap, we propose an adaptive prompting approach that predicts the optimal prompt composition ad-hoc for a given input. We apply our approach to social bias detection, a highly context-dependent task that requires semantic understanding. We evaluate it with three large language models on three datasets, comparing compositions to individual techniques and other baselines. The results underline the importance of finding an effective prompt composition. Our approach robustly ensures high detection performance, and is best in several settings. Moreover, first experiments on other tasks support its generalizability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 43 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
43 of 71 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 42
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
30 more
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
- 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 381
- 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 380
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 360
- 2021Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLPcited by 337
- 2022Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptionscited by 152
- 2022Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalizationcited by 139
- 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 136
- 2024In-Context Learning with Long-Context Models: An In-Depth Explorationcited by 128
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 98
- 2024What Did I Do Wrong? Quantifying LLMs' Sensitivity and Consistency to Prompt Engineeringcited by 90
- 2023Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Promptingcited by 81
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Model Biases in Persona-Steered Generationcited by 78
- 2022Faith-Shap: The Faithful Shapley Interaction Indexcited by 69
- 2023Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmarkcited by 63
- 2024Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generationcited by 63
- 2022From Shapley Values to Generalized Additive Models and backcited by 60
- 2023SHAP-IQ: Unified Approximation of any-order Shapley Interactionscited by 51
- 2024shapiq: Shapley Interactions for Machine Learningcited by 43
- 2024Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variationscited by 40
- 2023COBRA Frames: Contextual Reasoning about Effects and Harms of Offensive Statementscited by 34
- 2021Revealing Persona Biases in Dialogue Systemscited by 33
- 2024Beyond TreeSHAP: Efficient Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Tree Ensemblescited by 31
- 2024KernelSHAP-IQ: Weighted Least-Square Optimization for Shapley Interactionscited by 22
- 2024Prompting ChatGPT for Translation: A Comparative Analysis of Translation Brief and Persona Promptscited by 12
- 2020Argument from Old Man's View: Assessing Social Bias in Argumentationcited by 9
- 2023Soft-prompt Tuning for Large Language Models to Evaluate Biascited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Can Instruction Fine-Tuned Language Models Identify Social Bias through Prompting?
- 2025Bias after Prompting: Persistent Discrimination in Large Language Models
- 2025DR.GAP: Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models using Gender-Aware Prompting with Decoupled Reasoning
- 2023SocialStigmaQA: A Benchmark to Uncover Stigma Amplification in Generative Language Models
- 2024Towards Generalist Prompting for Large Language Models by Mental Models
- 2025Investigating Thinking Behaviours of Reasoning-Based Language Models for Social Bias Mitigation
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications
- 2024Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods