mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Soft-prompt Tuning for Large Language Models to Evaluate Bias

arXiv 2306.04735 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompting large language models has gained immense popularity in recent years due to the advantage of producing good results even without the need for labelled data. However, this requires prompt tuning to get optimal prompts that lead to better model performances. In this paper, we explore the use of soft-prompt tuning on sentiment classification task to quantify the biases of large language models (LLMs) such as Open Pre-trained Transformers (OPT) and Galactica language model. Since these models are trained on real-world data that could be prone to bias toward certain groups of populations, it is important to identify these underlying issues. Using soft-prompts to evaluate bias gives us the extra advantage of avoiding the human-bias injection that can be caused by manually designed prompts. We check the model biases on different sensitive attributes using the group fairness (bias) and find interesting bias patterns. Since LLMs have been used in the industry in various applications, it is crucial to identify the biases before deploying these models in practice. We open-source our pipeline and encourage industry researchers to adapt our work to their use cases.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2023.

Builds on

21 of 32 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  5. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  6. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  7. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  8. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  9. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  10. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
  11. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  12. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
9 more
  1. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
  2. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  3. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
  4. 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 439
  5. 2021Pre-Trained Models: Past, Present and Futurecited by 319
  6. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  7. 2021Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metricscited by 83
  8. 2020A Survey on Contextual Embeddingscited by 48
  9. 2021Quantifying Gender Biases Towards Politicians on Redditcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

6 papers.