Unsupervised deep learning for semantic segmentation of multispectral LiDAR forest point clouds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Point clouds captured with laser scanning systems from forest environments can be utilized in a wide variety of applications within forestry and plant ecology, such as the estimation of tree stem attributes, leaf angle distribution, and above-ground biomass. However, effectively utilizing the data in such tasks requires the semantic segmentation of the data into wood and foliage points, also known as leaf-wood separation. The traditional approach to leaf-wood separation has been geometry- and radiometry-based unsupervised algorithms, which tend to perform poorly on data captured with airborne laser scanning (ALS) systems, even with a high point density. While recent machine and deep learning approaches achieve great results even on sparse point clouds, they require manually labeled training data, which is often extremely laborious to produce. Multispectral (MS) information has been demonstrated to have potential for improving the accuracy of leaf-wood separation, but quantitative assessment of its effects has been lacking. This study proposes a fully unsupervised deep learning method, GrowSP-ForMS, which is specifically designed for leaf-wood separation of high-density MS ALS point clouds and based on the GrowSP architecture. GrowSP-ForMS achieved a mean accuracy of 84.3% and a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 69.6% on our MS test set, outperforming the unsupervised reference methods by a significant margin. When compared to supervised deep learning methods, our model performed similarly to the slightly older PointNet architecture but was outclassed by more recent approaches. Finally, two ablation studies were conducted, which demonstrated that our proposed changes increased the test set mIoU of GrowSP-ForMS by 29.4 percentage points (pp) in comparison to the original GrowSP model and that utilizing MS data improved the mIoU by 5.6 pp from the monospectral case.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 130 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
42 of 130 references.
References · 42
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
- 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
- 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,220
- 2020Point Transformercited by 1,462
- 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,202
- 20194D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1,201
- 2018PointCNN: Convolution On X-Transformed Pointscited by 764
- 20173D Semantic Segmentation with Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networkscited by 746
30 more
- 2020PCT: Point cloud transformercited by 730
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2020SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention Networkscited by 602
- 2019RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Cloudscited by 584
- 2023Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Strongercited by 579
- 2015Multi-view Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Shape Recognitioncited by 564
- 2020PointContrast: Unsupervised Pre-training for 3D Point Cloud Understandingcited by 502
- 2017Large-scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Graphscited by 384
- 2022Point Transformer V2: Grouped Vector Attention and Partition-based Poolingcited by 384
- 2016OctNet: Learning Deep 3D Representations at High Resolutionscited by 340
- 2018SqueezeSegV2: Improved Model Structure and Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Road-Object Segmentation from a LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 228
- 2020Exploring Data-Efficient 3D Scene Understanding with Contrastive Scene Contextscited by 210
- 2020SqueezeSegV3: Spatially-Adaptive Convolution for Efficient Point-Cloud Segmentationcited by 170
- 2018SPLATNet: Sparse Lattice Networks for Point Cloud Processingcited by 158
- 2021SE(3) Equivariant Graph Neural Networks with Complete Local Framescited by 75
- 2021SQN: Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale 3D Point Cloudscited by 64
- 2019Spherical Kernel for Efficient Graph Convolution on 3D Point Cloudscited by 57
- 2023Efficient 3D Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Transformercited by 56
- 2021SSPC-Net: Semi-supervised Semantic 3D Point Cloud Segmentation Networkcited by 54
- 2020Weakly Supervised Semantic Point Cloud Segmentation:Towards 10X Fewer Labelscited by 45
- 2022LESS: Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentation for LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 41
- 2019LatticeNet: Fast Point Cloud Segmentation Using Permutohedral Latticescited by 38
- 2023Automated forest inventory: analysis of high-density airborne LiDAR point clouds with 3D deep learningcited by 23
- 2023FOR-instance: a UAV laser scanning benchmark dataset for semantic and instance segmentation of individual treescited by 21
- 2023U3DS3: Unsupervised 3D Semantic Scene Segmentationcited by 16
- 2023PointDC:Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Clouds via Cross-modal Distillation and Super-Voxel Clusteringcited by 15
- 2023Point2Tree(P2T) -- framework for parameter tuning of semantic and instance segmentation used with mobile laser scanning data in coniferous forestcited by 14
- 2023Towards accurate instance segmentation in large-scale LiDAR point cloudscited by 8
- 2018Forest Tree Detection and Segmentation using High Resolution Airborne LiDARcited by 6
- 2024Unsupervised semantic segmentation of urban high-density multispectral point cloudscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 7.
7 papers.
- 2025LogoSP: Local-global Grouping of Superpoints for Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Cloudscited by 8
- 2025Multispectral airborne laser scanning for tree species classification: a benchmark of machine learning and deep learning algorithmscited by 6
- 20253D forest semantic segmentation using multispectral LiDAR and 3D deep learningcited by 2
- 2025Benchmarking individual tree segmentation using multispectral airborne laser scanning data: the FGI-EMIT datasetcited by 2
- 2025Transferable Foundation Models for Geometric Tasks on Point Cloud Representations: Geometric Neural Operatorscited by 1
- 2025Multispectral LiDAR data for extracting tree points in urban and suburban areascited by 0
- 2025NormalView: tree species classification from backpack and aerial lidar data using geometric projectionscited by 0
- 2025NormalView: tree species classification from backpack and aerial lidar data using geometric projections5 Dec 2025
- 2025Benchmarking individual tree segmentation using multispectral airborne laser scanning data: the FGI-EMIT dataset1 Nov 2025
- 2025Multispectral LiDAR data for extracting tree points in urban and suburban areas27 Aug 2025
- 20253D forest semantic segmentation using multispectral LiDAR and 3D deep learning8 Jul 2025
- 2025LogoSP: Local-global Grouping of Superpoints for Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation of 3D Point Clouds9 Jun 2025
- 2025Multispectral airborne laser scanning for tree species classification: a benchmark of machine learning and deep learning algorithms19 Apr 2025
- 2025Transferable Foundation Models for Geometric Tasks on Point Cloud Representations: Geometric Neural Operators6 Mar 2025