mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multispectral LiDAR data for extracting tree points in urban and suburban areas

arXiv 2508.19881 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Monitoring urban tree dynamics is vital for supporting greening policies and reducing risks to electrical infrastructure. Airborne laser scanning has advanced large-scale tree management, but challenges remain due to complex urban environments and tree variability. Multispectral (MS) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) improves this by capturing both 3D spatial and spectral data, enabling detailed mapping. This study explores tree point extraction using MS-LiDAR and deep learning (DL) models. Three state-of-the-art models are evaluated: Superpoint Transformer (SPT), Point Transformer V3 (PTv3), and Point Transformer V1 (PTv1). Results show the notable time efficiency and accuracy of SPT, with a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 85.28%. The highest detection accuracy is achieved by incorporating pseudo normalized difference vegetation index (pNDVI) with spatial data, reducing error rate by 10.61 percentage points (pp) compared to using spatial information alone. These findings highlight the potential of MS-LiDAR and DL to improve tree extraction and further tree inventories.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.

Builds on

5 of 22 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,470
  2. 2023Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Strongercited by 589
  3. 2023Efficient 3D Semantic Segmentation with Superpoint Transformercited by 57
  4. 2025Unsupervised deep learning for semantic segmentation of multispectral LiDAR forest point cloudscited by 7
  5. 2023Benchmarking Deep Learning Architectures for Urban Vegetation Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation from MLScited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.