mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Computational Approach to Visual Metonymy

arXiv 2601.17706 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.CVcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Images often communicate more than they literally depict: a set of tools can suggest an occupation and a cultural artifact can suggest a tradition. This kind of indirect visual reference, known as visual metonymy, invites viewers to recover a target concept via associated cues rather than explicit depiction. In this work, we present the first computational investigation of visual metonymy. We introduce a novel pipeline grounded in semiotic theory that leverages large language models and text-to-image models to generate metonymic visual representations. Using this framework, we construct ViMET, the first visual metonymy dataset comprising 2,000 multiple-choice questions to evaluate the cognitive reasoning abilities in multimodal language models. Experimental results on our dataset reveal a significant gap between human performance (86.9%) and state-of-the-art vision-language models (65.9%), highlighting limitations in machines' ability to interpret indirect visual references. Our dataset is publicly available at: https://github.com/cincynlp/ViMET.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 24 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2026.

Builds on

24 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Benchmarking Vision Language Models for Cultural Understanding15 Jul
  2. 2024Understanding Figurative Meaning through Explainable Visual Entailment2 May

Other references · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  6. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  7. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
  8. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
  9. 2025Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scalingcited by 812
  10. 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 556
  11. 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 435
  12. 2023I Spy a Metaphor: Large Language Models and Diffusion Models Co-Create Visual Metaphorscited by 31
10 more
  1. 2022MetaCLUE: Towards Comprehensive Visual Metaphors Researchcited by 28
  2. 2023IRFL: Image Recognition of Figurative Languagecited by 23
  3. 2024MMDocBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Visual Document Understandingcited by 19
  4. 2023Text-to-Image Generation for Abstract Conceptscited by 18
  5. 2024MVP-Bench: Can Large Vision--Language Models Conduct Multi-level Visual Perception Like Humans?cited by 9
  6. 2024Unveiling the Invisible: Captioning Videos with Metaphorscited by 7
  7. 2025ConMeC: A Dataset for Metonymy Resolution with Common Nounscited by 4
  8. 2025Seeing the Abstract: Translating the Abstract Language for Vision Language Modelscited by 4
  9. 2024Unveiling the Mystery of Visual Attributes of Concrete and Abstract Concepts: Variability, Nearest Neighbors, and Challenging Categoriescited by 3
  10. 2025Hummus: A Dataset of Humorous Multimodal Metaphor Usecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Would you still call this Dax? Novel Visual References in VLMs and Humans
  2. 2025VisualQuest: A Benchmark for Abstract Visual Reasoning in MLLMs
  3. 2026More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage
  4. 2024Can visual language models resolve textual ambiguity with visual cues? Let visual puns tell you!
  5. 2026VLMs Need Words: Vision Language Models Ignore Visual Detail In Favor of Semantic Anchors
  6. 2026Blending Concepts: Benchmarking Visual Metaphor Generation in Text-to-Image Models
  7. 2026Hidden Meanings in Plain Sight: RebusBench for Evaluating Cognitive Visual Reasoning
  8. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?