Conformal calibration and look-elsewhere effect in anomaly detection for new-physics searches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine-learned anomaly detection is reshaping searches for new physics, but it has outrun the statistics used to interpret it. A raw anomaly score has no calibrated meaning, a model that scans many regions inflates the look-elsewhere effect, and the asymptotic significances the field relies on are blind to the background mismodelling that anomaly detectors are especially prone to. We propose a calibration layer, built on conformal prediction, that turns any anomaly score into a defensible significance with distribution-free, finite-sample guarantees. Conformal prediction converts scores into valid local p-values, weighted and Mondrian variants repair the sideband-to-signal-region exchangeability failures that resonant searches suffer, and a Gross-Vitells step carries the result through to a look-elsewhere-aware global significance. The layer does two things at once. It exposes miscalibration that the standard pipeline cannot see, and it corrects it without retraining the detector. On public LHC Olympics data, a classifier develops a substructure-mass correlation that makes sideband-calibrated background p-values anti-conservative. Taken at face value, this manufactures a ~ 46σ excess from background sculpting alone, which the label-free weighted correction removes, restoring an honest null. When run as a blind wide-mass bump hunt, the standard asymptotic and unweighted procedures fabricate gtrsim10σ excesses and ≈5σ excesses even in signal-free windows, while the conformal layer raises no false alarms and its global false-positive rate is verified on background-only pseudoexperiments. The result is an auditable, detector-agnostic path from an uncalibrated score to a trials-factor-aware significance, ready to be folded into experimental anomaly searches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 11 references.
References · 7
- 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
- 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 355
- 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-valuescited by 69
- 2023Transductive conformal inference with adaptive scorescited by 21
- 2022Integrative conformal p-values for powerful out-of-distribution testing with labeled outlierscited by 19
- 2022Adaptive novelty detection with false discovery rate guaranteecited by 15
- 2025Robust Conformal Outlier Detection under Contaminated Reference Datacited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.