mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interaction-Aware Gaussian Weighting for Clustered Federated Learning

arXiv 2502.03340 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a decentralized paradigm to train models while preserving privacy. However, conventional FL struggles with data heterogeneity and class imbalance, which degrade model performance. Clustered FL balances personalization and decentralized training by grouping clients with analogous data distributions, enabling improved accuracy while adhering to privacy constraints. This approach effectively mitigates the adverse impact of heterogeneity in FL. In this work, we propose a novel clustered FL method, FedGWC (Federated Gaussian Weighting Clustering), which groups clients based on their data distribution, allowing training of a more robust and personalized model on the identified clusters. FedGWC identifies homogeneous clusters by transforming individual empirical losses to model client interactions with a Gaussian reward mechanism. Additionally, we introduce the Wasserstein Adjusted Score, a new clustering metric for FL to evaluate cluster cohesion with respect to the individual class distribution. Our experiments on benchmark datasets show that FedGWC outperforms existing FL algorithms in cluster quality and classification accuracy, validating the efficacy of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.

Builds on

24 of 45 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  4. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  5. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
  6. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  7. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 505
  8. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
  9. 2019FedMD: Heterogenous Federated Learning via Model Distillationcited by 454
  10. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
  11. 2020Google Landmarks Dataset v2 -- A Large-Scale Benchmark for Instance-Level Recognition and Retrievalcited by 305
  12. 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 222
12 more
  1. 2016Practical Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning on User-Held Datacited by 178
  2. 2020Mime: Mimicking Centralized Stochastic Algorithms in Federated Learningcited by 152
  3. 2020Federated Visual Classification with Real-World Data Distributioncited by 126
  4. 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 119
  5. 2021Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learningcited by 114
  6. 2021Multi-Center Federated Learning: Clients Clustering for Better Personalizationcited by 112
  7. 2023Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learning with Communication Compressioncited by 100
  8. 2022Improving Generalization in Federated Learning by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 98
  9. 2020FedGroup: Efficient Clustered Federated Learning via Decomposed Data-Driven Measurecited by 45
  10. 2021Cluster-driven Graph Federated Learning over Multiple Domainscited by 43
  11. 2019Federated Learning with Autotuned Communication-Efficient Secure Aggregationcited by 23
  12. 2022Collaboration in Participant-Centric Federated Learning: A Game-Theoretical Perspectivecited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.