Auditing a Dutch Public Sector Risk Profiling Algorithm Using an Unsupervised Bias Detection Tool
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithms are increasingly used to automate or aid human decisions, yet recent research shows that these algorithms may exhibit bias across legally protected demographic groups. However, data on these groups may be unavailable to organizations or external auditors due to privacy legislation. This paper studies bias detection using an unsupervised bias detection tool when data on demographic groups are unavailable. We collaborated with the Dutch Executive Agency for Education to audit an algorithm that was used to assign risk scores to college students at the national level in the Netherlands between 2012-2023. Our audit covers more than 250,000 students across the country. The unsupervised bias detection tool highlights known disparities between students with a non-European migration background and students with a Dutch or European-migration background. Our contributions are two-fold: (1) we assess bias in a real-world, large-scale, and high-stakes decision-making process by a governmental organization; (2) we provide the unsupervised bias detection tool in an open-source library for others to use to complete bias audits. Our work serves as a starting point for a deliberative assessment by human experts to evaluate potential discrimination in algorithmic decision-making.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
17 of 67 references.
References · 17
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
- 2018The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairnesscited by 94
- 2022Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governancecited by 67
- 2018Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Makingcited by 66
- 2020"What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand": Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairnesscited by 56
- 2018The age of secrecy and unfairness in recidivism predictioncited by 53
5 more
- 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
- 2021UDIS: Unsupervised Discovery of Bias in Deep Visual Recognition Modelscited by 23
- 2024Auditing Work: Exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regimecited by 18
- 2024OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 12
- 2022Using sensitive data to prevent discrimination by artificial intelligence: Does the GDPR need a new exception?cited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.