Error Slice Discovery via Manifold Compactness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the great performance of deep learning models in many areas, they still make mistakes and underperform on certain subsets of data, i.e. error slices. Given a trained model, it is important to identify its semantically coherent error slices that are easy to interpret, which is referred to as the error slice discovery problem. However, there is no proper metric of slice coherence without relying on extra information like predefined slice labels. Current evaluation of slice coherence requires access to predefined slices formulated by metadata like attributes or subclasses. Its validity heavily relies on the quality and abundance of metadata, where some possible patterns could be ignored. Besides, current algorithms cannot directly incorporate the constraint of coherence into their optimization objective due to absence of an explicit coherence metric, which could potentially hinder their effectiveness. In this paper, we propose manifold compactness, a coherence metric without reliance on extra information by incorporating the data geometry property into its design, and experiments on typical datasets empirically validate the rationality of the metric. Then we develop Manifold Compactness based error Slice Discovery (MCSD), a novel algorithm that directly treats risk and coherence as the optimization objective, and is flexible to be applied to models of various tasks. Extensive experiments on the benchmark and case studies on other typical datasets demonstrate the superiority of MCSD.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.
Builds on
39 of 62 references.
References · 39
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 485
- 2018Generalizing to Unseen Domains via Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 451
27 more
- 2020Self-Challenging Improves Cross-Domain Generalizationcited by 426
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
- 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
- 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
- 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 141
- 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
- 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 116
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
- 2021What Does Rotation Prediction Tell Us about Classifier Accuracy under Varying Testing Environments?cited by 63
- 2020Stable Prediction with Model Misspecification and Agnostic Distribution Shiftcited by 62
- 2021Detecting Errors and Estimating Accuracy on Unlabeled Data with Self-training Ensemblescited by 54
- 2022Predicting Out-of-Distribution Error with the Projection Normcited by 50
- 2022Discovering Bugs in Vision Models using Off-the-shelf Image Generation and Captioningcited by 45
- 2022Adaptive Testing of Computer Vision Modelscited by 39
- 2022UMIX: Improving Importance Weighting for Subpopulation Shift via Uncertainty-Aware Mixupcited by 34
- 2023Flatness-Aware Minimization for Domain Generalizationcited by 27
- 2023Confidence and Dispersity Speak: Characterising Prediction Matrix for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimationcited by 22
- 2023Rethinking the Evaluation Protocol of Domain Generalizationcited by 20
- 2024A Survey on Evaluation of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 20
- 2022A Note on "Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreement"cited by 16
- 2022Stable Learning via Sparse Variable Independencecited by 13
- 2024Bridging Multicalibration and Out-of-distribution Generalization Beyond Covariate Shiftcited by 10
- 2023PRIME: Prioritizing Interpretability in Failure Mode Extractioncited by 9
- 2020The Mathematical Foundations of Manifold Learningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Measurement Under Selection: Decoy-Calibrated Failure Audits for Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Data Heterogeneity Modeling for Trustworthy Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026UNBOX: Unveiling Black-box visual models with Natural-languagecited by 0
- 2026CB-SLICE: Concept-Based Interpretable Error Slice Discoverycited by 0
- 2026Measurement Under Selection: Decoy-Calibrated Failure Audits for Language Models8 Jun 2026
- 2026CB-SLICE: Concept-Based Interpretable Error Slice Discovery28 May 2026
- 2026UNBOX: Unveiling Black-box visual models with Natural-language9 Mar 2026
- 2025Data Heterogeneity Modeling for Trustworthy Machine Learning1 Jun 2025