Large Language Models as Common-Sense Heuristics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While systems designed for solving planning tasks vastly outperform Large Language Models (LLMs) in this domain, they usually discard the rich semantic information embedded within task descriptions. In contrast, LLMs possess parametrised knowledge across a wide range of topics, enabling them to leverage the natural language descriptions of planning tasks in their solutions. However, current research in this direction faces challenges in generating correct and executable plans. Furthermore, these approaches depend on the LLM to output solutions in an intermediate language, which must be translated into the representation language of the planning task. We introduce a novel planning method, which leverages the parametrised knowledge of LLMs by using their output as a heuristic for Hill-Climbing Search. This approach is further enhanced by prompting the LLM to generate a solution estimate to guide the search. Our method outperforms the task success rate of similar systems within a common household environment by 22 percentage points, with consistently executable plans. All actions are encoded in their original representation, demonstrating that strong results can be achieved without an intermediate language, thus eliminating the need for a translation step.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.
Builds on
25 of 56 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 846
- 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
13 more
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
- 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 411
- 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworkscited by 178
- 2023MMICL: Empowering Vision-language Model with Multi-Modal In-Context Learningcited by 171
- 2022Language Models of Code are Few-Shot Commonsense Learnerscited by 160
- 2023Generalized Planning in PDDL Domains with Pretrained Large Language Modelscited by 139
- 2024LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBenchcited by 93
- 2024LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With Thiscited by 77
- 2023Grounded Decoding: Guiding Text Generation with Grounded Models for Embodied Agentscited by 66
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Strong Abstract Reasonerscited by 52
- 2024Planning Anything with Rigor: General-Purpose Zero-Shot Planning with LLM-based Formalized Programmingcited by 35
- 2021proScript: Partially Ordered Scripts Generation via Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 21
- 2023Learning to Reason over Scene Graphs: A Case Study of Finetuning GPT-2 into a Robot Language Model for Grounded Task Planningcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.