Assessing the Impact of Image Dataset Features on Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) is crucial in many sectors, including computer vision. However, ML models trained on sensitive data face security challenges, as they can be attacked and leak information. Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML) addresses this by using Differential Privacy (DP) to balance utility and privacy. This study identifies image dataset characteristics that affect the utility and vulnerability of private and non-private Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models. Through analyzing multiple datasets and privacy budgets, we find that imbalanced datasets increase vulnerability in minority classes, but DP mitigates this issue. Datasets with fewer classes improve both model utility and privacy, while high entropy or low Fisher Discriminant Ratio (FDR) datasets deteriorate the utility-privacy trade-off. These insights offer valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers in estimating and optimizing the utility-privacy trade-off in image datasets, helping to inform data and privacy modifications for better outcomes based on dataset characteristics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.
Builds on
23 of 43 references.
References · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 266
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 212
- 2020Can AI help in screening Viral and COVID-19 pneumonia?cited by 200
11 more
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2018Privacy Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutionscited by 78
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
- 2021Antipodes of Label Differential Privacy: PATE and ALIBIcited by 50
- 2021DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?cited by 32
- 2023Have it your way: Individualized Privacy Assignment for DP-SGDcited by 21
- 2018RMDL: Random Multimodel Deep Learning for Classificationcited by 16
- 2019Effects of Differential Privacy and Data Skewness on Membership Inference Vulnerabilitycited by 15
- 2020Data and Model Dependencies of Membership Inference Attackcited by 10
- 2020Performance Analysis and Comparison of Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms for IoT Data Classificationcited by 8
- 2022Privacy in Practice: Private COVID-19 Detection in X-Ray Images (Extended Version)cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.