Exploring Primitive Visual Measurement Understanding and the Role of Output Format in Learning in Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
This work investigates the capabilities of current vision-language models (VLMs) in visual understanding and attribute measurement of primitive shapes using a benchmark focused on controlled 2D shape configurations with variations in spatial positioning, occlusion, rotation, size, and shape attributes such as type, quadrant, center-coordinates, rotation, occlusion status, and color as shown in Figure 1 and supplementary Figures S3-S81. We fine-tune state-of-the-art VLMs (2B-8B parameters) using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and validate them on multiple out-of-domain (OD) scenarios from our proposed benchmark. Our findings reveal that coherent sentence-based outputs outperform tuple formats, particularly in OD scenarios with large domain gaps. Additionally, we demonstrate that scaling numeric tokens during loss computation enhances numerical approximation capabilities, further improving performance on spatial and measurement tasks. These results highlight the importance of output format design, loss scaling strategies, and robust generalization techniques in enhancing the training and fine-tuning of VLMs, particularly for tasks requiring precise spatial approximations and strong OD generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2025.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Guiding Vision-Language Model Selection for Visual Question-Answering Across Tasks, Domains, and Knowledge Types14 Sep
- 2024PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer10 Jul
- 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into words9 Jul
- 2024Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMs20 Jun
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond24 Aug
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning29 Apr
Other references · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,079
- 2024When Do We Not Need Larger Vision Models?cited by 67
- 2020Reducing Language Biases in Visual Question Answering with Visually-Grounded Question Encodercited by 34
- 2024FlowVQA: Mapping Multimodal Logic in Visual Question Answering with Flowchartscited by 28
- 2022CLEVR-X: A Visual Reasoning Dataset for Natural Language Explanationscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
- 2025Do Vision-Language Models Measure Up? Benchmarking Visual Measurement Reading with MeasureBench
- 2025Hidden in plain sight: VLMs overlook their visual representations
- 2025SD-VLM: Spatial Measuring and Understanding with Depth-Encoded Vision-Language Models
- 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
- 2024Response Wide Shut: Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities
- 2026Not All Error Yields to Scale: Where Scaling Stops in Vision-Language Inference
- 2025Why Vision Language Models Struggle with Visual Arithmetic? Towards Enhanced Chart and Geometry Understanding