mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Communicating Activations Between Language Model Agents

arXiv 2501.14082 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 16

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Communication between multiple language model (LM) agents has been shown to scale up the reasoning ability of LMs. While natural language has been the dominant medium for inter-LM communication, it is not obvious this should be the standard: not only does natural language communication incur high inference costs that scale quickly with the number of both agents and messages, but also the decoding process abstracts away too much rich information that could be otherwise accessed from the internal activations. In this work, we propose a simple technique whereby LMs communicate via activations; concretely, we pause an LM textitB's computation at an intermediate layer, combine its current activation with another LM textitA's intermediate activation via some function textitf, then pass textitf's output into the next layer of textitB and continue the forward pass till decoding is complete. This approach scales up LMs on new tasks with zero additional parameters and data, and saves a substantial amount of compute over natural language communication. We test our method with various functional forms textitf on two experimental setups--multi-player coordination games and reasoning benchmarks--and find that it achieves up to 27.0% improvement over natural language communication across datasets with <1/4 the compute, illustrating the superiority and robustness of activations as an alternative "language" for communication between LMs.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Can Small Language Models Help Large Language Models Reason Better?: LM-Guided Chain-of-Thought4 Apr
  2. 2024Branch-Train-MiX: Mixing Expert LLMs into a Mixture-of-Experts LLM12 Mar

Other references · 22

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  5. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  8. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
  9. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  10. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
  11. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
  12. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
10 more
  1. 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 384
  2. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 366
  3. 2022Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 225
  4. 2017Deal or No Deal? End-to-End Learning for Negotiation Dialoguescited by 209
  5. 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 200
  6. 2022Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationcited by 191
  7. 2016Multi-Agent Cooperation and the Emergence of (Natural) Languagecited by 185
  8. 2024Learning to Decode Collaboratively with Multiple Language Modelscited by 62
  9. 2019Word-order biases in deep-agent emergent communicationcited by 18
  10. 2017Translating Neuralesecited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 13.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Negative Result on Cross-Model Activation Transfer in a Pythia Multi-Hop Setting
  2. 2026Multi-Stream LLMs: Unblocking Language Models with Parallel Streams of Thoughts, Inputs and Outputs
  3. 2026Think Before You Speak: Enabling Training-Free Latent Communication Between Language Models
  4. 2026Can Small Agents Collaborate to Beat a Single Large Language Model?
  5. 2026Good Agentic Friends Do Not Just Give Verbal Advice: They Can Update Your Weights
  6. 2024Controlling Large Language Model Agents with Entropic Activation Steering
  7. 2025Language Model Networks: Supervision-Efficient Learning through Dense Communication
  8. 2024Uncovering Latent Chain of Thought Vectors in Language Models