Social Circuits behind Multi-agent Echo Chambers
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Language-model agents exchange messages to combine evidence, but their communication can also create echo chambers that reinforce shared errors. However, overall task performance does not explain how a message changes the receiving agent's internal activations and affects its decision. In this work, we introduce Social Circuits, a framework for tracing message effects through receiver activations. We compare the receiver's answers before and after changing a message. Then, we restore selected activations recorded under the original message to determine how much of the message effect these activations reproduce. Based on Social Circuits, we propose Circuit-Guided Deliberation (CGD), which learns to select useful messages using receiver activation changes. We establish when activation replacement preserves receiver decisions and bound the gap between CGD's task performance and the best achievable through message selection. Experiments show that receiver activation changes explain the message effects and guide message selection that improves the task performance. Across three models and four datasets, CGD achieves the highest or joint-highest average accuracy in our main comparisons while generating fewer tokens than multi-agent baselines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 35 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
35 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Minority Sentinel: When to Overturn Majority Voting in Multi-Agent LLM Debates28 Jun
- 2026Multi-Agent Debate with Memory Masking3 Mar
- 2026The Value of Variance: Mitigating Debate Collapse in Multi-Agent Systems via Uncertainty-Driven Policy Optimization6 Feb
- 2025Key Decision-Makers in Multi-Agent Debates: Who Holds the Power?14 Nov
- 2025Beyond Majority Voting: LLM Aggregation by Leveraging Higher-Order Information1 Oct
- 2025Debate or Vote: Which Yields Better Decisions in Multi-Agent Large Language Models?24 Aug
- 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs29 Nov
Other references · 28
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
16 more
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 194
- 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 187
- 2024G-Designer: Architecting Multi-agent Communication Topologies via Graph Neural Networkscited by 110
- 2019On the Pitfalls of Measuring Emergent Communicationcited by 66
- 2025Correlated Errors in Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2025Understanding the Information Propagation Effects of Communication Topologies in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 39
- 2025Communicating Activations Between Language Model Agentscited by 15
- 2025Augmenting Multi-Agent Communication with State Delta Trajectorycited by 13
- 2025SafeSieve: From Heuristics to Experience in Progressive Pruning for LLM-based Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 12
- 2025Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution Behaviorscited by 11
- 2021Operationalizing Complex Causes: A Pragmatic View of Mediationcited by 8
- 2026Counterfactual Graph for Multi-Agent LLM Calibrationcited by 5
- 2026Do Latent Channels Actually Communicate? A Causal Audit of Latent Multi-Agent LLMcited by 5
- 2026MOC: Multi-Order Communication in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2024Isolated Causal Effects of Natural Languagecited by 2
- 2026Discovering Efficient and Explainable Communication Topologies for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems via Causal Inferencecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Playing social deduction games with reinforcement fine-tuned large language models
- 2025Training Language Models for Social Deduction with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Learning to Interrupt in Language-based Multi-agent Communication
- 2026Beyond Final Accuracy: Auditing Communication in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Mind or Message? Auditing Theory of Mind in Multi-Agent Social Simulation
- 2025Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models
- 2026Hidden Anchors in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation
- 2026SocialVeil: Probing Social Intelligence of Language Agents under Communication Barriers