Latent-space adversarial training with post-aware calibration for defending large language models against jailbreak attacks
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensuring safety alignment is a critical requirement for large language models (LLMs), particularly given increasing deployment in real-world applications. Despite considerable advancements, LLMs remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, which exploit system vulnerabilities to circumvent safety measures and elicit harmful or inappropriate outputs. Furthermore, while adversarial training-based defense methods have shown promise, a prevalent issue is the unintended over-defense behavior, wherein models excessively reject benign queries, significantly undermining their practical utility. To address these limitations, we introduce LATPC, a Latent-space Adversarial Training with Post-aware Calibration framework. LATPC dynamically identifies safety-critical latent dimensions by contrasting harmful and benign inputs, enabling the adaptive construction of targeted refusal feature removal attacks. This mechanism allows adversarial training to concentrate on real-world jailbreak tactics that disguise harmful queries as benign ones. During inference, LATPC employs an efficient embedding-level calibration mechanism to minimize over-defense behaviors with negligible computational overhead. Experimental results across five types of disguise-based jailbreak attacks demonstrate that LATPC achieves a superior balance between safety and utility compared to existing defense frameworks. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of leveraging safety-critical dimensions in developing robust defense methods against jailbreak attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 51 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2025.
Builds on
51 of 65 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Towards Inference-time Category-wise Safety Steering for Large Language Models2 Oct
- 2024Automatic Pseudo-Harmful Prompt Generation for Evaluating False Refusals in Large Language Models1 Sep
- 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Models31 May
- 2024Uncovering Safety Risks of Large Language Models through Concept Activation Vector18 Apr
- 2023Safer-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Automated Preference Data15 Nov
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
Other references · 44
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
32 more
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
- 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 520
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 507
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
- 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
- 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 434
- 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
- 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
- 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 248
- 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decodingcited by 233
- 2023Language Modeling Is Compressioncited by 225
- 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 162
- 2024AmpleGCG: Learning a Universal and Transferable Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes for Jailbreaking Both Open and Closed LLMscited by 160
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
- 2023Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Modelscited by 140
- 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attackscited by 135
- 2024Improved Techniques for Optimization-Based Jailbreaking on Large Language Modelscited by 98
- 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 82
- 2024Semantics-Adaptive Activation Intervention for LLMs via Dynamic Steering Vectorscited by 61
- 2024Robust LLM safeguarding via refusal feature adversarial trainingcited by 60
- 2024Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspectivecited by 44
- 2024Navigating the OverKill in Large Language Modelscited by 40
- 2024C-RAG: Certified Generation Risks for Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 27
- 2024Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMscited by 23
- 2024Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2024MoGU: A Framework for Enhancing Safety of Open-Sourced LLMs While Preserving Their Usabilitycited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026Calibrate-Then-Delegate: Safety Monitoring with Risk and Budget Guarantees via Model Cascadescited by 3
- 2025From Construction to Injection: Edit-Based Fingerprints for Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Selective Evidence Adoption from Contaminated Retrieval Resultscited by 2
- 2026AGMark: Attention-Guided Dynamic Watermarking for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Construction-Driven Injection: Linguistically-Grounded Edit-Based Code-Mixing Fingerprints for Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Efficient Safety Alignment of Language Models via Latent Personality Traitscited by 0
- 2026Divide, Consult, Conquer: Capability Laundering Through Aligned LLMscited by 0
- 2026Divide, Consult, Conquer: Capability Laundering Through Aligned LLMs14 Sep 2026
- 2026Construction-Driven Injection: Linguistically-Grounded Edit-Based Code-Mixing Fingerprints for Large Language Models28 Jul 2026
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Selective Evidence Adoption from Contaminated Retrieval Results22 Jul 2026
- 2026Efficient Safety Alignment of Language Models via Latent Personality Traits8 Jul 2026
- 2026Calibrate-Then-Delegate: Safety Monitoring with Risk and Budget Guarantees via Model Cascades15 Apr 2026
- 2026AGMark: Attention-Guided Dynamic Watermarking for Large Vision-Language Models10 Feb 2026
- 2025From Construction to Injection: Edit-Based Fingerprints for Large Language Models3 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
- 2025Latent Fusion Jailbreak: Blending Harmful and Harmless Representations to Elicit Unsafe LLM Outputs
- 2025LatentBreak: Jailbreaking Large Language Models through Latent Space Feedback
- 2025Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time
- 2026Target-free Latent Safety Alignment
- 2025Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs
- 2025Probing the Robustness of Large Language Models Safety to Latent Perturbations
- 2025LatentGuard: Controllable Latent Steering for Robust Refusal of Attacks and Reliable Response Generation