mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latent-space adversarial training with post-aware calibration for defending large language models against jailbreak attacks

arXiv 2501.10639 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2025cs.CR cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring safety alignment is a critical requirement for large language models (LLMs), particularly given increasing deployment in real-world applications. Despite considerable advancements, LLMs remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks, which exploit system vulnerabilities to circumvent safety measures and elicit harmful or inappropriate outputs. Furthermore, while adversarial training-based defense methods have shown promise, a prevalent issue is the unintended over-defense behavior, wherein models excessively reject benign queries, significantly undermining their practical utility. To address these limitations, we introduce LATPC, a Latent-space Adversarial Training with Post-aware Calibration framework. LATPC dynamically identifies safety-critical latent dimensions by contrasting harmful and benign inputs, enabling the adaptive construction of targeted refusal feature removal attacks. This mechanism allows adversarial training to concentrate on real-world jailbreak tactics that disguise harmful queries as benign ones. During inference, LATPC employs an efficient embedding-level calibration mechanism to minimize over-defense behaviors with negligible computational overhead. Experimental results across five types of disguise-based jailbreak attacks demonstrate that LATPC achieves a superior balance between safety and utility compared to existing defense frameworks. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of leveraging safety-critical dimensions in developing robust defense methods against jailbreak attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 51 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2025.

Builds on

51 of 65 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Towards Inference-time Category-wise Safety Steering for Large Language Models2 Oct
  2. 2024Automatic Pseudo-Harmful Prompt Generation for Evaluating False Refusals in Large Language Models1 Sep
  3. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Models31 May
  4. 2024Uncovering Safety Risks of Large Language Models through Concept Activation Vector18 Apr
  5. 2023Safer-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Automated Preference Data15 Nov
  6. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
  7. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 44

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  5. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  8. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  9. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  10. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  11. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  12. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
32 more
  1. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
  2. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
  3. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  4. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  5. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
  6. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
  7. 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Promptscited by 520
  8. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 507
  9. 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
  10. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
  11. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
  12. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 434
  13. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
  14. 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
  15. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 248
  16. 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decodingcited by 233
  17. 2023Language Modeling Is Compressioncited by 225
  18. 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllabilitycited by 162
  19. 2024AmpleGCG: Learning a Universal and Transferable Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes for Jailbreaking Both Open and Closed LLMscited by 160
  20. 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMscited by 158
  21. 2023Inspecting and Editing Knowledge Representations in Language Modelscited by 140
  22. 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attackscited by 135
  23. 2024Improved Techniques for Optimization-Based Jailbreaking on Large Language Modelscited by 98
  24. 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 82
  25. 2024Semantics-Adaptive Activation Intervention for LLMs via Dynamic Steering Vectorscited by 61
  26. 2024Robust LLM safeguarding via refusal feature adversarial trainingcited by 60
  27. 2024Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspectivecited by 44
  28. 2024Navigating the OverKill in Large Language Modelscited by 40
  29. 2024C-RAG: Certified Generation Risks for Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 27
  30. 2024Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMscited by 23
  31. 2024Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Modelscited by 21
  32. 2024MoGU: A Framework for Enhancing Safety of Open-Sourced LLMs While Preserving Their Usabilitycited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
  2. 2025Latent Fusion Jailbreak: Blending Harmful and Harmless Representations to Elicit Unsafe LLM Outputs
  3. 2025LatentBreak: Jailbreaking Large Language Models through Latent Space Feedback
  4. 2025Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time
  5. 2026Target-free Latent Safety Alignment
  6. 2025Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs
  7. 2025Probing the Robustness of Large Language Models Safety to Latent Perturbations
  8. 2025LatentGuard: Controllable Latent Steering for Robust Refusal of Attacks and Reliable Response Generation