mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Hemodynamic Scalar Fields on Coronary Artery Meshes: A Benchmark of Geometric Deep Learning Models

arXiv 2501.09046 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2025eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Coronary artery disease, caused by the narrowing of coronary vessels due to atherosclerosis, is the leading cause of death worldwide. The diagnostic gold standard, fractional flow reserve (FFR), measures the trans-stenotic pressure ratio during maximal vasodilation but is invasive and costly. This has driven the development of virtual FFR (vFFR) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate coronary flow. Geometric deep learning algorithms have shown promise for learning features on meshes, including cardiovascular research applications. This study empirically analyzes various backends for predicting vFFR fields in coronary arteries as CFD surrogates, comparing six backends for learning hemodynamics on meshes using CFD solutions as ground truth. The study has two parts: i) Using 1,500 synthetic left coronary artery bifurcations, models were trained to predict pressure-related fields for vFFR reconstruction, comparing different learning variables. ii) Using 427 patient-specific CFD simulations, experiments were repeated focusing on the best-performing learning variable from the synthetic dataset. Most backends performed well on the synthetic dataset, especially when predicting pressure drop over the manifold. Transformer-based backends outperformed others when predicting pressure and vFFR fields and were the only models achieving strong performance on patient-specific data, excelling in both average per-point error and vFFR accuracy in stenotic lesions. These results suggest geometric deep learning backends can effectively replace CFD for simple geometries, while transformer-based networks are superior for complex, heterogeneous datasets. Pressure drop was identified as the optimal network output for learning pressure-related fields.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2025.

Builds on

13 of 52 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
  5. 2020DiffusionNet: Discretization Agnostic Learning on Surfacescited by 163
  6. 2023Geometric Algebra Transformercited by 46
  7. 2022Mesh Neural Networks for SE(3)-Equivariant Hemodynamics Estimation on the Artery Wallcited by 29
  8. 2023Learning Reduced-Order Models for Cardiovascular Simulations with Graph Neural Networkscited by 20
  9. 2021Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flowcited by 15
  10. 2024LaB-GATr: geometric algebra transformers for large biomedical surface and volume meshescited by 12
  11. 2023SE(3) symmetry lets graph neural networks learn arterial velocity estimation from small datasetscited by 11
  12. 2021DeltaConv: Anisotropic Operators for Geometric Deep Learning on Point Cloudscited by 10
1 more
  1. 2023Attention-based Multi-fidelity Machine Learning Model for Computational Fractional Flow Reserve Assessmentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.