Data-driven system identification using quadratic embeddings of nonlinear dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a novel data-driven method called QENDy (Quadratic Embedding of Nonlinear Dynamics) that not only allows us to learn quadratic representations of highly nonlinear dynamical systems, but also to identify the governing equations. The approach is based on an embedding of the system into a higher-dimensional feature space in which the dynamics become quadratic. Just like SINDy (Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics), our method requires trajectory data, time derivatives for the training data points, which can also be estimated using finite difference approximations, and a set of preselected basis functions, called dictionary. We illustrate the efficacy and accuracy of QENDy with the aid of various benchmark problems and compare its performance with SINDy and a deep learning method for identifying quadratic embeddings. Furthermore, we analyze the convergence of QENDy and SINDy in the infinite data limit, highlight their similarities and main differences, and compare the quadratic embedding with linearization techniques based on the Koopman operator.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2025.
Builds on
16 of 48 references.
References · 16
- 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 134
- 2019Data-driven approximation of the Koopman generator: Model reduction, system identification, and controlcited by 85
- 2017Sparse learning of stochastic dynamic equationscited by 76
- 2021Koopman Operator Dynamical Models: Learning, Analysis and Controlcited by 42
- 2020Deep Neural Networks for Nonlinear Model Order Reduction of Unsteady Flowscited by 36
- 2017Koopman operator-based model reduction for switched-system control of PDEscited by 31
- 2016Linear identification of nonlinear systems: A lifting technique based on the Koopman operatorcited by 18
- 2021Physics-informed regularization and structure preservation for learning stable reduced models from data with operator inferencecited by 16
- 2018Nonlinear Model Order Reduction via Lifting Transformations and Proper Orthogonal Decompositioncited by 14
- 2023Guaranteed Stable Quadratic Models and their applications in SINDy and Operator Inferencecited by 10
- 2022Generalized Quadratic Embeddings for Nonlinear Dynamics using Deep Learningcited by 9
- 2024Dynamical systems and complex networks: A Koopman operator perspectivecited by 9
4 more
- 2020Stability Domains for Quadratic-Bilinear Reduced-Order Modelscited by 8
- 2014Abstraction of Elementary Hybrid Systems by Variable Transformationcited by 4
- 2023Koopman Spectral Linearization vs. Carleman Linearization: A Computational Comparison Studycited by 1
- 2023Dissipative quadratizations of polynomial ODE systemscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.