mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Guaranteed Stable Quadratic Models and their applications in SINDy and Operator Inference

arXiv 2308.13819 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.NA math.DScited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific machine learning for inferring dynamical systems combines data-driven modeling, physics-based modeling, and empirical knowledge. It plays an essential role in engineering design and digital twinning. In this work, we primarily focus on an operator inference methodology that builds dynamical models, preferably in low-dimension, with a prior hypothesis on the model structure, often determined by known physics or given by experts. Then, for inference, we aim to learn the operators of a model by setting up an appropriate optimization problem. One of the critical properties of dynamical systems is stability. However, this property is not guaranteed by the inferred models. In this work, we propose inference formulations to learn quadratic models, which are stable by design. Precisely, we discuss the parameterization of quadratic systems that are locally and globally stable. Moreover, for quadratic systems with no stable point yet bounded (e.g., chaotic Lorenz model), we discuss how to parameterize such bounded behaviors in the learning process. Using those parameterizations, we set up inference problems, which are then solved using a gradient-based optimization method. Furthermore, to avoid numerical derivatives and still learn continuous systems, we make use of an integral form of differential equations. We present several numerical examples, illustrating the preservation of stability and discussing its comparison with the existing state-of-the-art approach to infer operators. By means of numerical examples, we also demonstrate how the proposed methods are employed to discover governing equations and energy-preserving models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2023.

Builds on

16 of 58 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2014Dynamic mode decomposition with controlcited by 129
  4. 2019Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 96
  5. 2016Generalizing Koopman Theory to allow for inputs and controlcited by 53
  6. 2020Data-driven reduced-order models via regularized operator inference for a single-injector combustion processcited by 42
  7. 2021Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems using a Runge-Kutta Inspired Dictionary-based Sparse Regression Approachcited by 36
  8. 2020Operator inference for non-intrusive model reduction of systems with non-polynomial nonlinear termscited by 32
  9. 2021Non-intrusive reduced-order models for parametric partial differential equations via data-driven operator inferencecited by 23
  10. 2021Physics-informed regularization and structure preservation for learning stable reduced models from data with operator inferencecited by 16
  11. 2023Canonical and Noncanonical Hamiltonian Operator Inferencecited by 15
  12. 2018Nonlinear Model Order Reduction via Lifting Transformations and Proper Orthogonal Decompositioncited by 14
4 more
  1. 2022Operator inference with roll outs for learning reduced models from scarce and low-quality datacited by 11
  2. 2020Operator Inference and Physics-Informed Learning of Low-Dimensional Models for Incompressible Flowscited by 10
  3. 2020Stability Domains for Quadratic-Bilinear Reduced-Order Modelscited by 8
  4. 2016On computing the distance to stability for matrices using linear dissipative Hamiltonian systemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

11 papers.