mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Maximizing Uncertainty for Federated learning via Bayesian Optimisation-based Model Poisoning

arXiv 2501.08002 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As we transition from Narrow Artificial Intelligence towards Artificial Super Intelligence, users are increasingly concerned about their privacy and the trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) technology. A common denominator for the metrics of trustworthiness is the quantification of uncertainty inherent in DL algorithms, and specifically in the model parameters, input data, and model predictions. One of the common approaches to address privacy-related issues in DL is to adopt distributed learning such as federated learning (FL), where private raw data is not shared among users. Despite the privacy-preserving mechanisms in FL, it still faces challenges in trustworthiness. Specifically, the malicious users, during training, can systematically create malicious model parameters to compromise the models predictive and generative capabilities, resulting in high uncertainty about their reliability. To demonstrate malicious behaviour, we propose a novel model poisoning attack method named Delphi which aims to maximise the uncertainty of the global model output. We achieve this by taking advantage of the relationship between the uncertainty and the model parameters of the first hidden layer of the local model. Delphi employs two types of optimisation , Bayesian Optimisation and Least Squares Trust Region, to search for the optimal poisoned model parameters, named as Delphi-BO and Delphi-LSTR. We quantify the uncertainty using the KL Divergence to minimise the distance of the predictive probability distribution towards an uncertain distribution of model output. Furthermore, we establish a mathematical proof for the attack effectiveness demonstrated in FL. Numerical results demonstrate that Delphi-BO induces a higher amount of uncertainty than Delphi-LSTR highlighting vulnerability of FL systems to model poisoning attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2025.

Builds on

20 of 42 references.

References · 20

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  4. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  5. 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 665
  6. 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
  7. 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 462
  8. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
  9. 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 407
  10. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
  11. 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
  12. 2019FedHealth: A Federated Transfer Learning Framework for Wearable Healthcarecited by 182
8 more
  1. 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
  2. 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 65
  3. 2017The reparameterization trick for acquisition functionscited by 61
  4. 2024An Aggregation-Free Federated Learning for Tackling Data Heterogeneitycited by 33
  5. 2019Towards calibrated and scalable uncertainty representations for neural networkscited by 10
  6. 2023Data-Agnostic Model Poisoning against Federated Learning: A Graph Autoencoder Approachcited by 9
  7. 2024Countermeasures Against Adversarial Examples in Radio Signal Classificationcited by 5
  8. 2022Distributed Intelligence in Wireless Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.