Practical Design and Benchmarking of Generative AI Applications for Surgical Billing and Coding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Healthcare has many manual processes that can benefit from automation and augmentation with Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), the medical billing and coding process. However, current foundational Large Language Models (LLMs) perform poorly when tasked with generating accurate International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Additionally, there are many security and financial challenges in the application of generative AI to healthcare. We present a strategy for developing generative AI tools in healthcare, specifically for medical billing and coding, that balances accuracy, accessibility, and patient privacy. Methods: We fine tune the PHI-3 Mini and PHI-3 Medium LLMs using institutional data and compare the results against the PHI-3 base model, a PHI-3 RAG application, and GPT-4o. We use the post operative surgical report as input and the patients billing claim the associated ICD-10, CPT, and Modifier codes as the target result. Performance is measured by accuracy of code generation, proportion of invalid codes, and the fidelity of the billing claim format. Results: Both fine-tuned models performed better or as well as GPT-4o. The Phi-3 Medium fine-tuned model showed the best performance (ICD-10 Recall and Precision: 72%, 72%; CPT Recall and Precision: 77%, 79%; Modifier Recall and Precision: 63%, 64%). The Phi-3 Medium fine-tuned model only fabricated 1% of ICD-10 codes and 0.6% of CPT codes generated. Conclusions: Our study shows that a small model that is fine-tuned on domain-specific data for specific tasks using a simple set of open-source tools and minimal technological and monetary requirements performs as well as the larger contemporary consumer models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024The Potential and Perils of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
- 2025Generative AI for Healthcare: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Perspectives
- 2025Leveraging Generative AI Through Prompt Engineering and Rigorous Validation to Create Comprehensive Synthetic Datasets for AI Training in Healthcare
- 2026Training a Large Language Model for Medical Coding Using Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Clinical Data
- 2026Can Post-Training Turn LLMs into Good Medical Coders? An Empirical Study of Generative ICD Coding
- 2024CARES: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Trustworthiness in Medical Vision Language Models
- 2026Improving the Safety and Trustworthiness of Medical AI via Multi-Agent Evaluation Loops
- 2026Symphony for Medical Coding: A Next-Generation Agentic System for Scalable and Explainable Medical Coding