mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models

arXiv 2501.05468 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2025cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses are essential for synthesizing research insights, but they remain time-intensive and labor-intensive due to the iterative processes of screening, evaluation, and data extraction. This paper introduces and evaluates LatteReview, a Python-based framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems to automate key elements of the systematic review process. Designed to streamline workflows while maintaining rigor, LatteReview utilizes modular agents for tasks such as title and abstract screening, relevance scoring, and structured data extraction. These agents operate within orchestrated workflows, supporting sequential and parallel review rounds, dynamic decision-making, and iterative refinement based on user feedback. LatteReview's architecture integrates LLM providers, enabling compatibility with both cloud-based and locally hosted models. The framework supports features such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for incorporating external context, multimodal reviews, Pydantic-based validation for structured inputs and outputs, and asynchronous programming for handling large-scale datasets. The framework is available on the GitHub repository, with detailed documentation and an installable package.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 0 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2025.

Builds on

0 of 24 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation
  2. 2025Can Agents Judge Systematic Reviews Like Humans? Evaluating SLRs with LLM-based Multi-Agent System
  3. 2026meta-pipe: An LLM-agent pipeline for end-to-end automated systematic review and meta-analysis
  4. 2025LiRA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Readable Literature Review Generation
  5. 2025Completing A Systematic Review in Hours instead of Months with Interactive AI Agents
  6. 2026Evaluating AI-based Scientific Knowledge Synthesis with Epidemiological Systematic Reviews
  7. 2026Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews
  8. 2026LUMEN: Cost-Transparent Multi-Agent Pipeline for Automated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis