mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Constructing Executable Analytical Knowledge Representations for Meta-Analysis Synthesis Using an Agentic Harness

arXiv 2608.01711 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Meta-analysis synthesis highlights a fundamental challenge in knowledge-based scientific analysis: structured evidence does not by itself represent the analytical knowledge required for executable computation. Decisions about evidence assignment, analytical contrasts, outcome and time-point alignment, effect-size formulation, and methodological admissibility must be explicit before statistical execution. Existing automated approaches often embed these decisions in model outputs, generated code, or workflow traces rather than representing them as independently verifiable knowledge. We introduce the Executable Analytical Knowledge Representation (EAKR), a machine-actionable representation of the knowledge required to transform structured evidence into executable meta-analysis. An EAKR represents evidence, relations, numerical inputs, constraints, provenance, and unresolved issues. We operationalise EAKR in MetaSynDec, an agentic harness in which large language models propose structured updates and deterministic services govern schema- and contract-based validation and execution. Across 58 synthesis units, MetaSynDec constructed all EAKRs, with 57 proceeding to statistical execution. Of 56 units with sufficient information to define a reference analysis object, 38 (67.9%) achieved complete object fidelity and 42 (75.0%) exact evidence-set agreement, with a mean Jaccard similarity of 0.909. Generated and published confidence intervals overlapped in 54 of 55 units (98.2%). MetaSynDec outperformed direct LLM generation in reference synthesis-structure agreement (57/58 versus 23/58; p<0.001) and among 23 jointly completed units, exact reference-formulation agreement (23/23 versus 1/23; p<0.001). These findings provide feasibility evidence that EAKR supports formal validation, traceability, statistical execution, and improved methodological agreement relative to direct LLM generation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

13 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Manalyzer: End-to-end Automated Meta-analysis with Multi-agent System22 May
  2. 2025LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models5 Jan

Other references · 11

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  2. 2022FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspectivecited by 13
  3. 2020The role of metadata in reproducible computational researchcited by 10
  4. 2022FAIR principles for AI models with a practical application for accelerated high energy diffraction microscopycited by 10
  5. 2023Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Cratecited by 9
  6. 2025Transforming Evidence Synthesis: A Systematic Review of the Evolution of Automated Meta-Analysis in the Age of AIcited by 7
  7. 2025What Level of Automation is "Good Enough"? A Benchmark of Large Language Models for Meta-Analysis Data Extractioncited by 6
  8. 2024Empowering Meta-Analysis: Leveraging Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesiscited by 4
  9. 2024TIC: Translate-Infer-Compile for accurate "text to plan" using LLMs and Logical Representationscited by 2
  10. 2024Formal Definition and Implementation of Reproducibility Tenets for Computational Workflowscited by 1
  11. 2024Introducing SWIRL: An Intermediate Representation Language for Scientific Workflowscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AutoSynthesis: An agentic system for automated meta-analysis
  2. 2025PERELMAN: Pipeline for scientific literature meta-analysis. Technical report
  3. 2026SCIRIGOR:Evaluating Open-Ended Scientific Analysis Beyond Final Scores
  4. 2026meta-pipe: An LLM-agent pipeline for end-to-end automated systematic review and meta-analysis
  5. 2026Probing the Future of Meta-Analysis: Eliciting Design Principles via an Agentic Research IDE
  6. 2026Automated Synthesis and Adversarial Validation of Executable Causal Research Pipelines
  7. 2026Evaluating AI-based Scientific Knowledge Synthesis with Epidemiological Systematic Reviews
  8. 2026MetaSyn: A Benchmark for LLM Agents on Meta-Analysis Articles from Nature Portfolio