mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

arXiv 2403.08399 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2024cs.SEcited by 13

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic literature review (SLR) is foundational to evidence-based research, enabling scholars to identify, classify, and synthesize existing studies to address specific research questions. Conducting an SLR is, however, largely a manual process. In recent years, researchers have made significant progress in automating portions of the SLR pipeline to reduce the effort and time required for high-quality reviews; nevertheless, there remains a lack of AI-agent-based systems that automate the entire SLR workflow. To this end, we introduce a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs. Leveraging large language models (LLMs), our system streamlines the review process to enhance efficiency and accuracy. Through a user-friendly interface, researchers specify a topic; the system then generates a search string to retrieve relevant academic papers. Next, an inclusion/exclusion filtering step is applied to titles relevant to the research area. The system subsequently summarizes paper abstracts and retains only those directly related to the field of study. In the final phase, it conducts a thorough analysis of the selected papers with respect to predefined research questions. This paper presents the system, describes its operational framework, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision. The code for this project is available at: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/SLR-automation .

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2024.

Builds on

6 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis2 Feb

Other references · 5

  1. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  2. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
  3. 2023Autonomous Agents in Software Development: A Vision Papercited by 12
  4. 2021Analysing the use of graphs to represent the results of Systematic Reviews in Software Engineeringcited by 1
  5. 2021A Visual Analysis Approach to Update Systematic Reviewscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Can Agents Judge Systematic Reviews Like Humans? Evaluating SLRs with LLM-based Multi-Agent System
  2. 2025LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models
  3. 2026Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews
  4. 2026Evaluating AI-based Scientific Knowledge Synthesis with Epidemiological Systematic Reviews
  5. 2025LiRA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Readable Literature Review Generation
  6. 2025Completing A Systematic Review in Hours instead of Months with Interactive AI Agents
  7. 2026meta-pipe: An LLM-agent pipeline for end-to-end automated systematic review and meta-analysis
  8. 2025ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews