mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Study of the Efficacy of Generative Flow Networks for Robotics and Machine Fault-Adaptation

arXiv 2501.03405 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2025cs.ROcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot locomotion and manipulation

Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in robotics have opened possibilities to automate tasks in various fields such as manufacturing, emergency response and healthcare. However, a significant challenge that prevents robots from operating in real-world environments effectively is out-of-distribution (OOD) situations, wherein robots encounter unforseen situations. One major OOD situations is when robots encounter faults, making fault adaptation essential for real-world operation for robots. Current state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms show promising results but suffer from sample inefficiency, leading to low adaptation speed due to their limited ability to generalize to OOD situations. Our research is a step towards adding hardware fault tolerance and fast fault adaptability to machines. In this research, our primary focus is to investigate the efficacy of generative flow networks in robotic environments, particularly in the domain of machine fault adaptation. We simulated a robotic environment called Reacher in our experiments. We modify this environment to introduce four distinct fault environments that replicate real-world machines/robot malfunctions. The empirical evaluation of this research indicates that continuous generative flow networks (CFlowNets) indeed have the capability to add adaptive behaviors in machines under adversarial conditions. Furthermore, the comparative analysis of CFlowNets with reinforcement learning algorithms also provides some key insights into the performance in terms of adaptation speed and sample efficiency. Additionally, a separate study investigates the implications of transferring knowledge from pre-fault task to post-fault environments. Our experiments confirm that CFlowNets has the potential to be deployed in a real-world machine and it can demonstrate adaptability in case of malfunctions to maintain functionality.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot locomotion and manipulation, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Much Ado About Noising: Dispelling the Myths of Generative Robotic Control
  2. 2026FlowDAgger: Human-in-the-Loop Adaptation of Generative Robot Policies in Latent Space
  3. 2024Adaptable Recovery Behaviors in Robotics: A Behavior Trees and Motion Generators(BTMG) Approach for Failure Management
  4. 2026FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvement
  5. 2025Action Flow Matching for Continual Robot Learning
  6. 2023CFlowNets: Continuous Control with Generative Flow Networks
  7. 2026RoboFFT: Finetuning generative robot policy via online reinforcement learning with forward process
  8. 2025Failure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policies