mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CPTuning: Contrastive Prompt Tuning for Generative Relation Extraction

arXiv 2501.02196 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative relation extraction (RE) commonly involves first reformulating RE as a linguistic modeling problem easily tackled with pre-trained language models (PLM) and then fine-tuning a PLM with supervised cross-entropy loss. Although having achieved promising performance, existing approaches assume only one deterministic relation between each pair of entities without considering real scenarios where multiple relations may be valid, i.e., entity pair overlap, causing their limited applications. To address this problem, we introduce a novel contrastive prompt tuning method for RE, CPTuning, which learns to associate a candidate relation between two in-context entities with a probability mass above or below a threshold, corresponding to whether the relation exists. Beyond learning schema, CPTuning also organizes RE as a verbalized relation generation task and uses Trie-constrained decoding to ensure a model generates valid relations. It adaptively picks out the generated candidate relations with a high estimated likelihood in inference, thereby achieving multi-relation extraction. We conduct extensive experiments on four widely used datasets to validate our method. Results show that T5-large fine-tuned with CPTuning significantly outperforms previous methods, regardless of single or multiple relations extraction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2025.

Builds on

47 of 61 references.

References · 47

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  9. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  10. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
  11. 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Language Representation with Informative Entitiescited by 525
  12. 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
35 more
  1. 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 386
  2. 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
  3. 2020K-Adapter: Infusing Knowledge into Pre-Trained Models with Adapterscited by 318
  4. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 299
  5. 2019Knowledge Enhanced Contextual Word Representationscited by 294
  6. 2019TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 290
  7. 2019Matching the Blanks: Distributional Similarity for Relation Learningcited by 271
  8. 2021Curriculum Learning: A Surveycited by 257
  9. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  10. 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 201
  11. 2021Structured Prediction as Translation between Augmented Natural Languagescited by 183
  12. 2021KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extractioncited by 180
  13. 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
  14. 2021Template-Based Named Entity Recognition Using BARTcited by 153
  15. 2018Graph Convolution over Pruned Dependency Trees Improves Relation Extractioncited by 146
  16. 2020Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 107
  17. 2019Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answeringcited by 96
  18. 2020TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Taskcited by 96
  19. 2019Enriching Pre-trained Language Model with Entity Information for Relation Classificationcited by 82
  20. 2021An Improved Baseline for Sentence-level Relation Extractioncited by 80
  21. 2020PLATO-2: Towards Building an Open-Domain Chatbot via Curriculum Learningcited by 79
  22. 2020Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation Extractioncited by 75
  23. 2021Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Datasetcited by 73
  24. 2021Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 73
  25. 2020Norm-Based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
  26. 2021GenIE: Generative Information Extractioncited by 53
  27. 2020On the Importance of Word and Sentence Representation Learning in Implicit Discourse Relation Classificationcited by 40
  28. 2019Fine-Tuning by Curriculum Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 39
  29. 2021Learning from Noisy Labels for Entity-Centric Information Extractioncited by 34
  30. 2021Relation Classification with Entity Type Restrictioncited by 31
  31. 2020GDPNet: Refining Latent Multi-View Graph for Relation Extractioncited by 29
  32. 2021Zero-Shot Information Extraction as a Unified Text-to-Triple Translationcited by 22
  33. 2022Generative Prompt Tuning for Relation Classificationcited by 13
  34. 2021Improving Sentence-Level Relation Extraction through Curriculum Learningcited by 8
  35. 2020Complex Relation Extraction: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.