mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differentiable Prompt Learning for Vision Language Models

arXiv 2501.00457 ↗First posted 31 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt learning is an effective way to exploit the potential of large-scale pre-trained foundational models. Continuous prompts parameterize context tokens in prompts by turning them into differentiable vectors. Deep continuous prompts insert prompts not only in the input but also in the intermediate hidden representations. Manually designed deep continuous prompts exhibit a remarkable improvement compared to the zero-shot pre-trained model on downstream tasks. How to automate the continuous prompt design is an underexplored area, and a fundamental question arises, is manually designed deep prompt strategy optimal? To answer this question, we propose a method dubbed differentiable prompt learning (DPL). The DPL method is formulated as an optimization problem to automatically determine the optimal context length of the prompt to be added to each layer, where the objective is to maximize the performance. We test the DPL method on the pre-trained CLIP. We empirically find that by using only limited data, our DPL method can find deep continuous prompt configuration with high confidence. The performance on the downstream tasks exhibits the superiority of the automatic design: our method boosts the average test accuracy by 2.60% on 11 datasets compared to baseline methods. Besides, our method focuses only on the prompt configuration (i.e. context length for each layer), which means that our method is compatible with the baseline methods that have sophisticated designs to boost the performance. The DPL method can be deployed to large language models or computer vision models at no cost.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 55 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2024.

Builds on

55 of 81 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMs13 Apr
  2. 2022Unified Vision and Language Prompt Learning13 Oct
  3. 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning30 May
  4. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models10 Mar
  5. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 50

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  6. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  9. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  12. 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
38 more
  1. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  2. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
  3. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  4. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  6. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
  7. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
  8. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  9. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  10. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  11. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  12. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  13. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  14. 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
  15. 2022DualPrompt: Complementary Prompting for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 635
  16. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  17. 2019PC-DARTS: Partial Channel Connections for Memory-Efficient Architecture Searchcited by 265
  18. 2019Searching for A Robust Neural Architecture in Four GPU Hourscited by 258
  19. 2022Visual Prompting via Image Inpaintingcited by 248
  20. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  21. 2019Understanding and Robustifying Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 176
  22. 2023Visual Prompt Multi-Modal Trackingcited by 141
  23. 2019Fair DARTS: Eliminating Unfair Advantages in Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 129
  24. 2019DARTS+: Improved Differentiable Architecture Search with Early Stoppingcited by 105
  25. 2023Task-Specific Skill Localization in Fine-tuned Language Modelscited by 104
  26. 2016Less-forgetting Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 97
  27. 2020Few-Shot Text Generation with Pattern-Exploiting Trainingcited by 87
  28. 2022Understanding and Improving Visual Prompting: A Label-Mapping Perspectivecited by 86
  29. 2021BERTese: Learning to Speak to BERTcited by 82
  30. 2022Probing Representation Forgetting in Supervised and Unsupervised Continual Learningcited by 74
  31. 2021Partial Is Better Than All: Revisiting Fine-tuning Strategy for Few-shot Learningcited by 72
  32. 2023Advances and Challenges in Meta-Learning: A Technical Reviewcited by 65
  33. 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
  34. 2022Transfer without Forgettingcited by 44
  35. 2016Convolutional Neural Fabricscited by 32
  36. 2023Convolutional Visual Prompt for Robust Visual Perceptioncited by 17
  37. 2019Targeted transfer learning to improve performance in small medical physics datasetscited by 11
  38. 2023On Surgical Fine-tuning for Language Encoderscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023DPL: Decoupled Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024PLPP: Prompt Learning with Perplexity Is Self-Distillation for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2024Cascade Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Model Adaptation
  4. 2024Revisiting Prompt Pretraining of Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Weighted Multi-Prompt Learning with Description-free Large Language Model Distillation
  6. 2024Make Prompts Adaptable: Bayesian Modeling for Vision-Language Prompt Learning with Data-Dependent Prior
  7. 2022Learning Domain Invariant Prompt for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024Learning to Prompt with Text Only Supervision for Vision-Language Models