mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PLPP: Prompt Learning with Perplexity Is Self-Distillation for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2412.15277 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) models such as CLIP have demonstrated their excellent performance across numerous downstream tasks. A recent method, Context Optimization (CoOp), further improves the performance of VL models on downstream tasks by introducing prompt learning. CoOp optimizes a set of learnable vectors, aka prompt, and freezes the whole CLIP model. However, relying solely on CLIP loss to fine-tune prompts can lead to models that are prone to overfitting on downstream task. To address this issue, we propose a plug-in prompt-regularization method called PLPP (Prompt Learning with PerPlexity), which use perplexity loss to regularize prompt learning. PLPP designs a two-step operation to compute the perplexity for prompts: (a) calculating cosine similarity between the weight of the embedding layer and prompts to get labels, (b) introducing a language model (LM) head that requires no training behind text encoder to output word probability distribution. Meanwhile, we unveil that the essence of PLPP is inherently a form of self-distillation. To further prevent overfitting as well as to reduce the additional computation introduced by PLPP, we turn the hard label to soft label and choose top-k values for calculating the perplexity loss. For accelerating model convergence, we introduce mutual self-distillation learning, that is perplexity and inverted perplexity loss. The experiments conducted on four classification tasks indicate that PLPP exhibits superior performance compared to existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 2 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2024.

Builds on

2 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Prompt Tuning based Adapter for Vision-Language Model Adaption24 Mar

Other references · 1

  1. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Revisiting Prompt Pretraining of Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026What Does Prompt Learning Change? -A Natural-Language Concept Analysis of Vision-Language Models
  3. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2023PRE: Vision-Language Prompt Learning with Reparameterization Encoder
  5. 2025A Retrospect to Multi-prompt Learning across Vision and Language
  6. 2023DPL: Decoupled Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2024PromptKD: Unsupervised Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Prompt-OT: An Optimal Transport Regularization Paradigm for Knowledge Preservation in Vision-Language Model Adaptation