On Surgical Fine-tuning for Language Encoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning all the layers of a pre-trained neural language encoder (either using all the parameters or using parameter-efficient methods) is often the de-facto way of adapting it to a new task. We show evidence that for different downstream language tasks, fine-tuning only a subset of layers is sufficient to obtain performance that is close to and often better than fine-tuning all the layers in the language encoder. We propose an efficient metric based on the diagonal of the Fisher information matrix (FIM score), to select the candidate layers for selective fine-tuning. We show, empirically on GLUE and SuperGLUE tasks and across distinct language encoders, that this metric can effectively select layers leading to a strong downstream performance. Our work highlights that task-specific information corresponding to a given downstream task is often localized within a few layers, and tuning only those is sufficient for strong performance. Additionally, we demonstrate the robustness of the FIM score to rank layers in a manner that remains constant during the optimization process.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2023.
Builds on
9 of 16 references.
References · 9
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
- 2022LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 230
- 2021Training Neural Networks with Fixed Sparse Maskscited by 214
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
- 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
- 2022SparseAdapter: An Easy Approach for Improving the Parameter-Efficiency of Adapterscited by 83
- 2021Robust Transfer Learning with Pretrained Language Models through Adapterscited by 35
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025Fed-HeLLo: Efficient Federated Foundation Model Fine-Tuning with Heterogeneous LoRA Allocationcited by 7
- 2025Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Target Language Adaptation of LLMs via Source-Shielded Updatescited by 4
- 2026Layer-wise LoRA fine-tuning: a similarity metric approachcited by 3
- 2024Surgical Feature-Space Decomposition of LLMs: Why, When and How?cited by 2
- 2024Differentiable Prompt Learning for Vision Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Positional Cognitive Specialization: Where Do LLMs Learn To Comprehend and Speak Your Language?cited by 1
- 2026FIM-LoRA: Task-Informative Rank Allocation for LoRA via Calibration-Time Gradient-Variance Estimationcited by 1
- 2025Deterministic Bounds and Random Estimates of Metric Tensors on Neuromanifoldscited by 0
- 2026FIM-LoRA: Task-Informative Rank Allocation for LoRA via Calibration-Time Gradient-Variance Estimation16 May 2026
- 2026Positional Cognitive Specialization: Where Do LLMs Learn To Comprehend and Speak Your Language?1 Apr 2026
- 2026Layer-wise LoRA fine-tuning: a similarity metric approach5 Feb 2026
- 2025Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Target Language Adaptation of LLMs via Source-Shielded Updates4 Dec 2025
- 2025Fed-HeLLo: Efficient Federated Foundation Model Fine-Tuning with Heterogeneous LoRA Allocation13 Jun 2025
- 2025Deterministic Bounds and Random Estimates of Metric Tensors on Neuromanifolds19 May 2025
- 2024Differentiable Prompt Learning for Vision Language Models31 Dec 2024
- 2024Surgical Feature-Space Decomposition of LLMs: Why, When and How?17 May 2024