mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GASLITEing the Retrieval: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Dense Embedding-based Search

arXiv 2412.20953 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2024cs.CR cs.CLcited by 20

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Dense embedding-based text retrievalunicodex2013retrieval of relevant passages from corpora via deep learning encodingsunicodex2013has emerged as a powerful method attaining state-of-the-art search results and popularizing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). Still, like other search methods, embedding-based retrieval may be susceptible to search-engine optimization (SEO) attacks, where adversaries promote malicious content by introducing adversarial passages to corpora. Prior work has shown such SEO is feasible, mostly demonstrating attacks against retrieval-integrated systems (e.g., RAG). Yet, these consider relaxed SEO threat models (e.g., targeting single queries), use baseline attack methods, and provide small-scale retrieval evaluation, thus obscuring our comprehensive understanding of retrievers' worst-case behavior. This work aims to faithfully and thoroughly assess retrievers' robustness, paving a path to uncover factors related to their susceptibility to SEO. To this end, we, first, propose the GASLITE attack for generating adversarial passages, thatunicodex2013without relying on the corpus content or modifying the modelunicodex2013carry adversary-chosen information while achieving high retrieval ranking, consistently outperforming prior approaches. Second, using GASLITE, we extensively evaluate retrievers' robustness, testing nine advanced models under varied threat models, while focusing on pertinent adversaries targeting queries on a specific concept (e.g., a public figure). Amongst our findings: retrievers are highly vulnerable to SEO against concept-specific queries, even under negligible poisoning rates (e.g., ≥0.0001% of the corpus), while generalizing across different corpora and query distributions; single-query SEO is completely solved by GASLITE; adaptive attacks demonstrate bypassing common defenses; [...]

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 60 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2024.

Builds on

60 of 109 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Machine Against the RAG: Jamming Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Blocker Documents9 Jun

Other references · 59

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  9. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  10. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  11. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  12. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
38 more
  1. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  2. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,463
  3. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  4. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
  5. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
  6. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
  7. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  8. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  9. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  10. 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 702
  11. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  12. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
  13. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  14. 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
  15. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 519
  16. 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 501
  17. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
  18. 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexitycited by 431
  19. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Basescited by 429
  20. 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 422
  21. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
  22. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 315
  23. 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 303
  24. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 290
  25. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 267
  26. 2020MiniLMv2: Multi-Head Self-Attention Relation Distillation for Compressing Pretrained Transformerscited by 245
  27. 2019High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networkscited by 214
  28. 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 192
  29. 2023Automatically Auditing Large Language Models via Discrete Optimizationcited by 191
  30. 2023Poisoning Retrieval Corpora by Injecting Adversarial Passagescited by 159
  31. 2024Stealing Part of a Production Language Modelcited by 159
  32. 2024AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMscited by 156
  33. 2024Jasper and Stella: distillation of SOTA embedding modelscited by 112
  34. 2023AutoDAN: Interpretable Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 111
  35. 2024Neural Exec: Learning (and Learning from) Execution Triggers for Prompt Injection Attackscited by 85
  36. 2023Nightshade: Prompt-Specific Poisoning Attacks on Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 75
  37. 2024Arctic-Embed: Scalable, Efficient, and Accurate Text Embedding Modelscited by 61
  38. 2022PRADA: Practical Black-Box Adversarial Attacks against Neural Ranking Modelscited by 44

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 15.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Under the Hood of SKILL.md: Semantic Supply-chain Attacks on AI Agent Skill Registrycited by 12
  2. 2025Uncovering Competing Poisoning Attacks in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 5
  3. 2025Ranking Free RAG: Replacing Re-ranking with Selection in RAG for Sensitive Domainscited by 5
  4. 2025RAG-Pull: Turning Retrieval into a Code-Injection Channel via Invisible Unicode Perturbationscited by 4
  5. 2026Hijacking Agent Memory: Stealthy Trojan Attacks Through Conversational Interactioncited by 4
  6. 2025UniC-RAG: Universal Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 3
  7. 2026Connect the Dots: Knowledge Graph-Guided Crawler Attack on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 3
  8. 2025DisarmRAG: Stealthy Retriever-Centric Poisoning to Disable Self-Correction in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Extended Version)cited by 2
  9. 2026Securing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Taxonomy of Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directionscited by 2
  10. 2026How Generative AI Disrupts Search: An Empirical Study of Google Search, Gemini, and AI Overviewscited by 2
  11. 2026Needle-in-RAG: Prompt-Conditioned Character-Level Traceback of Poisoned Spans in Retrieved Evidencecited by 1
  12. 2026SilentRetrieval: Hijacking Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Semantically-Preserving Adversarial Data Poisoningcited by 1
8 more
  1. 2026When Global Gating Is Enough: Admission-Time Hubness Control in Anisotropic Vector Retrieval Systemscited by 1
  2. 2026Red-Teaming Claude Opus and ChatGPT-based Security Advisors for Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 0
  3. 2026On the Robustness of LLM-Based Dense Retrievers: A Systematic Analysis of Generalizability and Stabilitycited by 0
  4. 2026CleanBase: Detecting Malicious Documents in RAG Knowledge Databasescited by 0
  5. 2026BiRD: A Bidirectional Ranking Defense Mechanism for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 0
  6. 2026Embedding Inference Attackcited by 0
  7. 2026TriShieldRAG: 3 Rings, One Blind Spot in Layered Defenses for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
  8. 2026Similarity Is Not Validity: Defending LLM Semantic Caches Against Poisoningcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Corpus Poisoning via Approximate Greedy Gradient Descent
  2. 2024Understanding and Mitigating the Threat of Vec2Text to Dense Retrieval Systems
  3. 2026Retrieved But Not Reliable: A Survey on Attacks, and Defenses in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  4. 2026SentAttack: A Sentence-Level Black-Box Adversarial Attack Method for Dense Retrieval Models
  5. 2024Backdoor Attacks on Dense Retrieval via Public and Unintentional Triggers
  6. 2026ProGRank: Probe-Gradient Reranking to Defend Dense-Retriever RAG from Corpus Poisoning
  7. 2025RAGPart & RAGMask: Retrieval-Stage Defenses Against Corpus Poisoning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2024On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within Knowledge-Intensive Application Domains