mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding and Mitigating the Threat of Vec2Text to Dense Retrieval Systems

arXiv 2402.12784 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2024cs.IR cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of Vec2Text -- a method for text embedding inversion -- has raised serious privacy concerns for dense retrieval systems which use text embeddings, such as those offered by OpenAI and Cohere. This threat comes from the ability for a malicious attacker with access to embeddings to reconstruct the original text. In this paper, we investigate various factors related to embedding models that may impact text recoverability via Vec2Text. We explore factors such as distance metrics, pooling functions, bottleneck pre-training, training with noise addition, embedding quantization, and embedding dimensions, which were not considered in the original Vec2Text paper. Through a comprehensive analysis of these factors, our objective is to gain a deeper understanding of the key elements that affect the trade-offs between the text recoverability and retrieval effectiveness of dense retrieval systems, offering insights for practitioners designing privacy-aware dense retrieval systems. We also propose a simple embedding transformation fix that guarantees equal ranking effectiveness while mitigating the recoverability risk. Overall, this study reveals that Vec2Text could pose a threat to current dense retrieval systems, but there are some effective methods to patch such systems.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  3. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
  4. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  5. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
  6. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
  7. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
  8. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 410
  9. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 266
  10. 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
  11. 2023Text Embeddings Reveal (Almost) As Much As Textcited by 189
  12. 2021Condenser: a Pre-training Architecture for Dense Retrievalcited by 162
11 more
  1. 2023Poisoning Retrieval Corpora by Injecting Adversarial Passagescited by 153
  2. 2022Dense Text Retrieval based on Pretrained Language Models: A Surveycited by 136
  3. 2022DiffCSE: Difference-based Contrastive Learning for Sentence Embeddingscited by 131
  4. 2022RetroMAE: Pre-Training Retrieval-oriented Language Models Via Masked Auto-Encodercited by 118
  5. 2022SimLM: Pre-training with Representation Bottleneck for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 90
  6. 2021Semantic Models for the First-stage Retrieval: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 57
  7. 2022LexMAE: Lexicon-Bottlenecked Pretraining for Large-Scale Retrievalcited by 18
  8. 2022ConTextual Masked Auto-Encoder for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 16
  9. 2022Lecture Notes on Neural Information Retrievalcited by 7
  10. 2024Foundations of Vector Retrievalcited by 5
  11. 2023Typos-aware Bottlenecked Pre-Training for Robust Dense Retrievalcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

9 papers.