mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Recommender Engine Driven Client Selection in Federated Brain Tumor Segmentation

arXiv 2412.20250 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents a robust and efficient client selection protocol designed to optimize the Federated Learning (FL) process for the Federated Tumor Segmentation Challenge (FeTS 2024). In the evolving landscape of FL, the judicious selection of collaborators emerges as a critical determinant for the success and efficiency of collective learning endeavors, particularly in domains requiring high precision. This work introduces a recommender engine framework based on non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) and a hybrid aggregation approach that blends content-based and collaborative filtering. This method intelligently analyzes historical performance, expertise, and other relevant metrics to identify the most suitable collaborators. This approach not only addresses the cold start problem where new or inactive collaborators pose selection challenges due to limited data but also significantly improves the precision and efficiency of the FL process. Additionally, we propose harmonic similarity weight aggregation (HSimAgg) for adaptive aggregation of model parameters. We utilized a dataset comprising 1,251 multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans from individuals diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) for training purposes and an additional 219 mpMRI scans for external evaluations. Our federated tumor segmentation approach achieved dice scores of 0.7298, 0.7424, and 0.8218 for enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), and whole tumor (WT) segmentation tasks respectively on the external validation set. In conclusion, this research demonstrates that selecting collaborators with expertise aligned to specific tasks, like brain tumor segmentation, improves the effectiveness of FL networks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2024.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  3. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
  4. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  5. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
  6. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 503
  7. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 419
  8. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 352
  9. 2018A Hybrid Approach to Privacy-Preserving Federated Learningcited by 210
  10. 2021The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challengecited by 50
  11. 2021Emerging Trends in Federated Learning: From Model Fusion to Federated X Learningcited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.